Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31455893›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2019

Unravelling tumour heterogeneity by single-cell profiling of circulating tumour cells.

Laura Keller, Klaus Pantel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 284 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
284citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

284 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Development of infrared desolvation device for single cell element analysis using droplet sample injection inductively coupled plasma spectrometry.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Towards biomarker-driven therapies for urothelial carcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

224 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura KellerDepartment of Tumour Biology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-9760
Klaus PantelDepartment of Tumour Biology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. pantel@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-2772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell technologies have contributed to unravelling tumour heterogeneity, now considered a hallmark of cancer and one of the main causes of tumour resistance to cancer therapies. Liquid biopsy (LB), defined as the detection and analysis of cells or cell products released by tumours into the blood, offers an appealing minimally invasive approach that allows the characterization and monitoring of tumour heterogeneity in individual patients. Here, we will review and discuss how circulating tumour cell (CTC) analysis at single-cell resolution provides unique insights into tumour heterogeneity that are not revealed by analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) derived from LBs. The molecular analysis of CTCs provides complementary information to that of genomic aberrations determined using ctDNA to fully describe many different cellular components (for example, DNA, RNA, proteins and metabolites) that can influence tumour heterogeneity.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyBreast NeoplasmsChromosome AberrationsEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiceNeoplasmsNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPhenotypePrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.