ArticleDiabetes care2019
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors and Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Real-world Evidence in U.S. Adults.
Article in Diabetes care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caution in handling switchers in pharmacoepidemiologic studies estimating treatment effects: the example of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and inflammatory bowel disease.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- GLP-1 and GLP-2 as intestinal reparative therapies in inflammatory bowel disease: mechanisms, translation, and clinical opportunity.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative risks of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors: a real-world nationwide cohort study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Confer No Increased Rates of IBD Exacerbation Among Patients With IBD.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Association of Antidiabetic Drug Target Genes with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Revolutionizing Treatment Strategies for Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders: The Impact of Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Review
- A Road Map for Peer Review of Real-World Evidence Studies on Safety and Effectiveness of Treatments.Diabetes care · 2023Review
- Emerging Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 in Autoimmune Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2022 · on this mapReview
- Safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2022Review
- Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-induced autoimmune diseases: Current evidence.World journal of diabetes · 2021Review
- GLP-1 based therapies and disease course of inflammatory bowel disease.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA recent study raises concerns that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are associated with increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We evaluated the association between new use of DPP4i and IBD risk compared with other second-line antihyperglycemics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsWe implemented an active-comparator, new-user cohort design using two U.S. administrative claims databases for commercially insured (MarketScan) and older adult (Medicare fee-for-service, 20% random sample) patients from January 2007 to December 2016. We identified patients, aged ≥18 years, who initiated DPP4i versus sulfonylureas (SUs) or initiated DPP4i versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs) and were without prior diagnosis, treatment, or procedure for IBD. The primary outcome was incident IBD, defined by IBD diagnosis preceded by colonoscopy and biopsy and followed by IBD treatment. We performed propensity score weighting to control for measured baseline confounding, estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs [95% CI]) using weighted Cox proportional hazards models, and used random-effects meta-analysis models to pool aHRs across cohorts.
resultsWe identified 895,747 eligible patients initiating DPP4i, SU, or TZD; IBD incidence rates ranged from 11.6 to 32.3/100,000 person-years. Over a median treatment duration of 1.09-1.69 years, DPP4i were not associated with increased IBD risk across comparisons. The pooled aHRs for IBD were 0.82 (95% CI 0.41-1.61) when comparing DPP4i (
conclusionsOur population-based cohort study of U.S. adults with diabetes suggests that short-term DPP4i treatment does not increase IBD risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.