Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31479921›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2019

Selecting Essential MicroRNAs Using a Novel Voting Method.

Xiaoqing Ru, Peigang Cao, Lihong Li, Quan Zou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Research on the Computational Prediction of Essential Genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoqing RuInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China; School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China.
Peigang CaoDepartment of Cardiology, Heilongjiang Province Land Reclamation Headquarters General Hospital, Harbin, China.
Lihong LiSchool of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China.
Quan ZouInstitute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China; Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: zouquan@nclab.net.
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CNHebei University of Engineering · CNHeilongjiang Academy of Land Reclamation Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the large number of known microRNAs (miRNAs), some miRNAs play negligible roles in cell regulation. Therefore, selecting essential miRNAs is an important initial step for a deeper understanding of miRNAs and their functions. In this study, we generated 60 classification models by combining 12 representative feature extraction methods and 5 commonly used classification algorithms. The optimal model for essential miRNA classification that we obtained is based on the Mismatch feature extraction method combined with the random forest algorithm. The F-Measure, area under the curve, and accuracy values of this model were 93.2%, 96.7%, and 93.0%, respectively. We also found that the distribution of the positive and negative examples of the first few features greatly influenced the classification results. The feature extraction methods performed best when the differences between the positive and negative examples were obvious, and this led to better classification of essential miRNAs. Because each classifier's predictions for the same sample may be different, we employed a novel voting method to improve the accuracy of the classification of essential miRNAs. The performance results showed that the best classification results were obtained when five classification models were used in the voting. The five classification models were constructed based on the Mismatch, pseudo-distance structure status pair composition, Subsequence, Kmer, and Triplet feature extraction methods. The voting result was 95.3%. Our results suggest that the voting method can be an important tool for selecting essential miRNAs.

Indexed as

biological functionclassificationfeature extractionmiRNAvoting

Identifiers

PMID31479921
PMCPMC6727015
OpenAlexW2964792397

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.