ArticleMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids2019
Selecting Essential MicroRNAs Using a Novel Voting Method.
Article in Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- EssTFNet: integration of adaptive time-frequency and DNA language models for interpretable human essential gene prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- GeneAI 3.0: powerful, novel, generalized hybrid and ensemble deep learning frameworks for miRNA species classification of stationary patterns from nucleotides.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- sORFPred: A Method Based on Comprehensive Features and Ensemble Learning to Predict the sORFs in Plant LncRNAs.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2023Article
- XGEM: Predicting Essential miRNAs by the Ensembles of Various Sequence-Based Classifiers With XGBoost Algorithm.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Research on the Computational Prediction of Essential Genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Predicting Preference of Transcription Factors for Methylated DNA Using Sequence Information.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the large number of known microRNAs (miRNAs), some miRNAs play negligible roles in cell regulation. Therefore, selecting essential miRNAs is an important initial step for a deeper understanding of miRNAs and their functions. In this study, we generated 60 classification models by combining 12 representative feature extraction methods and 5 commonly used classification algorithms. The optimal model for essential miRNA classification that we obtained is based on the Mismatch feature extraction method combined with the random forest algorithm. The F-Measure, area under the curve, and accuracy values of this model were 93.2%, 96.7%, and 93.0%, respectively. We also found that the distribution of the positive and negative examples of the first few features greatly influenced the classification results. The feature extraction methods performed best when the differences between the positive and negative examples were obvious, and this led to better classification of essential miRNAs. Because each classifier's predictions for the same sample may be different, we employed a novel voting method to improve the accuracy of the classification of essential miRNAs. The performance results showed that the best classification results were obtained when five classification models were used in the voting. The five classification models were constructed based on the Mismatch, pseudo-distance structure status pair composition, Subsequence, Kmer, and Triplet feature extraction methods. The voting result was 95.3%. Our results suggest that the voting method can be an important tool for selecting essential miRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.