ReviewMolecular nutrition & food research2019
GutSelf: Interindividual Variability in the Processing of Dietary Compounds by the Human Gastrointestinal Tract.
Review in Molecular nutrition & food research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Differential Effects of Collagen Hydrolysate Digesta on Osteoclast and Osteoblast Responses In Vitro.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The food matrix as a confounder in diet‒microbiome studies: methodological challenges and research gaps.Gut microbes reports · 2026Review
- Factors shaping sugar metabolism in Neotropical bats: A physiological and ecological perspective.PloS one · 2026Article
- Gene expression profiling reveals enhanced nutrient and drug metabolism and maturation of hiPSC-derived intestine-on-chip relative to organoids and Transwells.Stem cell reports · 2025Article
- Zinc as a Modulator of miRNA Signaling in Obesity.Nutrients · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review on the Molecular Mechanism of Lycopene in Cancer Therapy.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Sex-Based Differences in the In Vitro Digestibility of MCT Emulsions Stabilized by Various Emulsifiers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Fatty Acid Bioaccessibility in Commercial Marine Oil Supplements: An In Vitro Integrated Analytical Study.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Impacts of dietary animal and plant protein on weight and glycemic control in health, obesity and type 2 diabetes: friend or foe?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Enteral Route Nanomedicine for Cancer Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
- Article
- A grape seed and bilberry extract reduces blood pressure in individuals at risk of developing type 2 diabetes: the PRECISE study, a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over intervention study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- An efficient urine peptidomics workflow identifies chemically defined dietary gluten peptides from patients with celiac disease.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Molecular regulation after mucosal injury and regeneration in ulcerative colitis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Development of Personalized Nutrition: Applications in Lactose Intolerance Diagnosis and Management.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Regulation of gene expression in chickens by heat stress.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Mechanisms Linking the Gut-Muscle Axis With Muscle Protein Metabolism and Anabolic Resistance: Implications for Older Adults at Risk of Sarcopenia.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional research is currently entering the field of personalized nutrition, to a large extent driven by major technological breakthroughs in analytical sciences and biocomputing. An efficient launching of the personalized approach depends on the ability of researchers to comprehensively monitor and characterize interindividual variability in the activity of the human gastrointestinal tract. This information is currently not available in such a form. This review therefore aims at identifying and discussing published data, providing evidence on interindividual variability in the processing of the major nutrients, i.e., protein, fat, carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals, along the gastrointestinal tract, including oral processing, intestinal digestion, and absorption. Although interindividual variability is not a primary endpoint of most studies identified, a significant number of publications provides a wealth of information on this topic for each category of nutrients. This knowledge remains fragmented, however, and understanding the clinical relevance of most of the interindividual responses to food ingestion described in this review remains unclear. In that regard, this review has identified a gap and sets the base for future research addressing the issue of the interindividual variability in the response of the human organism to the ingestion of foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.