Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31483780›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Human umbilical cord blood monocytes, but not adult blood monocytes, rescue brain cells from hypoxic-ischemic injury: Mechanistic and therapeutic implications.

Arjun Saha, Sachit Patel, Li Xu, Paula Scotland, Jonathan Schwartzman, Anthony J Filiano, Joanne Kurtzberg, Andrew E Balber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arjun SahaMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5080-307X
Sachit PatelMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Li XuMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Paula ScotlandMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jonathan SchwartzmanMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-0529
Anthony J FilianoMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Joanne KurtzbergMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Andrew E BalberMarcus Center for Cellular Cures (MC3), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cord blood (CB) mononuclear cells (MNC) are being tested in clinical trials to treat hypoxic-ischemic (HI) brain injuries. Although early results are encouraging, mechanisms underlying potential clinical benefits are not well understood. To explore these mechanisms further, we exposed mouse brain organotypic slice cultures to oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD) and then treated the brain slices with cells from CB or adult peripheral blood (PB). We found that CB-MNCs protect neurons from OGD-induced death and reduced both microglial and astrocyte activation. PB-MNC failed to affect either outcome. The protective activities were largely mediated by factors secreted by CB-MNC, as direct cell-to-cell contact between the injured brain slices and CB cells was not essential. To determine if a specific subpopulation of CB-MNC are responsible for these protective activities, we depleted CB-MNC of various cell types and found that only removal of CB CD14+ monocytes abolished neuroprotection. We also used positively selected subpopulations of CB-MNC and PB-MNC in this assay and demonstrated that purified CB-CD14+ cells, but not CB-PB CD14+ cells, efficiently protected neuronal cells from death and reduced glial activation following OGD. Gene expression microarray analysis demonstrated that compared to PB-CD14+ monocytes, CB-CD14+ monocytes over-expressed several secreted proteins with potential to protect neurons. Differential expression of five candidate effector molecules, chitinase 3-like protein-1, inhibin-A, interleukin-10, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and thrombospondin-1, were confirmed by western blotting, and immunofluorescence. These findings suggest that CD14+ monocytes are a critical cell-type when treating HI with CB-MNC.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationAnimalsBiomarkersCells, CulturedCell SurvivalCytokinesFetal BloodGlucoseHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainImmunophenotypingLeukocytes, MononuclearMiceMicrogliaMonocytesNeuronsOxygenBiomarkersCytokinesGlucoseOxygen

Identifiers

PMID31483780
PMCPMC6726370
OpenAlexW2971005275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.