Evidence mapPaperPMID 31490400Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Efficacy and safety of different doses of azilsartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension: A protocol of a network meta-analysis.

Yan Zhang, Huijin Yu, Kangmei Shao, Xinyue Luo, Jiancheng Wang, Gen Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan ZhangSpinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Center Hospital of Gansu Province.
Huijin YuSpinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Center Hospital of Gansu Province.
Kangmei ShaoThe Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University.
Xinyue LuoThe Second Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University.
Jiancheng WangGansu Provincial Hospital.
Gen ChenPathogens Biology Institute, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is one of the most common chronic diseases and an increasingly public-health challenge worldwide. Previous meta-analyses evaluated the effects of azilsartan medoxomil compared to placebo or other antihypertensive drugs in patients with hypertension. However, it is still unclear which dose of azilsartan is optimal. This study will perform a network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of different doses of azilsartan medoxomil in patients with hypertension.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE.com, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2019. Randomized controlled trials reporting efficacy and safety of different doses of azilsartan medoxomil on hypertension will be included if they compared 1 dose of azilsartan medoxomil with another dose of azilsartan medoxomil or with a placebo. Risk of bias of the included trials will be evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook 5.1.0. NMA will be performed in a Bayesian hierarchical framework using WinBUGS 14.

resultsThe results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

conclusionThis study will summarize all the available data to provide reliable evidence of the value of different doses of azilsartan medoxomil for the treatment of hypertension. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019136882.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersBenzimidazolesHumansHypertensionNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicOxadiazolesAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockersazilsartan medoxomilBenzimidazolesOxadiazoles

Identifiers

PMID31490400
PMCPMC6739004

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.