Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31496756›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2019

Optimizing compliance with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery at a referral teaching hospital in southern Iran: clinical and economic impact.

Laleh Mahmoudi, Mehrdad Ghouchani, Motahareh Mahi-Birjand, Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Akbari

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laleh MahmoudiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrdad GhouchaniDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Motahareh Mahi-BirjandInfectious Disease Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Alimohammad BananzadehColorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali AkbariDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRBirjand University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic prophylaxis is one of the major approaches to prevent surgical site infection. Despite the availability of international guidelines on it, the practice of antibiotic prophylaxis is still far from optimal. This study aimed to assess the impact of guideline implementation on the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics and its cost-saving effect in gastrointestinal surgery by clinical pharmacist intervention.

methodsA pre and post intervention study was carried out between October 2017 and June 2018 on patients who underwent gastrointestinal surgery in a major referral teaching hospital in Shiraz, southern Iran. The intervention phase consisted of revising the institutional guidelines for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, assigning a clinical pharmacist to the surgical department, and arranging several meetings with the surgical department regarding the appropriate utilization of antibiotics. Differences in antibiotic utilization in patients before and after the intervention phase were compared. Exposures were surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis timing and agents, and main outcomes were incidence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay.

resultsA total of 430 patients were included in the post intervention phase, while 445 patients were included in the baseline evaluation. Promoting appropriate antibiotic use in the post intervention group had the potential to decrease medication costs by reducing unnecessary prescriptions and duration of antibiotic usage (

conclusionThis study provides evidence that adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis guidelines increased the rational use of prophylactic antibiotics, with substantial cost savings in patients who underwent surgery.

Indexed as

cost savingefficacy of guidelineIDSA guidelineprophylaxis antibiotic

Identifiers

PMID31496756
PMCPMC6689569
OpenAlexW2966030057

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.