Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31498516›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2019

Masked hypertensives: A disguised arterial stiffness population.

Christina Antza, Ioannis Doundoulakis, Stella Stabouli, Konstantinos Tziomalos, Vasilios Kotsis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Measuring arterial stiffness in clinical practice: Moving one step forward.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020
    Article
  4. The challenge of simplifying blood pressure screening in children and adolescents.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2020
    Article
  5. Masked hypertensives: A disguised arterial stiffness population.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019
    Article
  6. Hypertension and arterial stiffness.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina Antza3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension-24h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Center, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ioannis Doundoulakis3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension-24h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Center, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Stella Stabouli1st Department of Pediatrics, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Konstantinos Tziomalos1st Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, AHEPA Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3172-1594
Vasilios Kotsis3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Hypertension-24h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Center, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-8097
Papageorgiou General Hospital · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether masked hypertension (MHT) and white coat hypertension (WCHT) could be related to increased arterial stiffness and to identify the best office cutoff values of office BP for the diagnosis of MHT and WCHT. A total of 542 consecutive patients (50.2% male, age 42.5 ± 26.2 years) were included in the study. Patients were never treated before for hypertension. Patients were classified as true normotensives (44%), true hypertensives (30%), WC hypertensives (19%), and masked hypertensives (7%). Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (c-f PWV) was 9.91 ± 0.20 m/s in true normotension, 10.26 ± 0.27 m/s in WCHT, 11.28 ± 0.47 m/s in MHT, and 11.86 ± 0.23 m/s in true hypertension after adjustment for age and sex. Decision limits yielding 65% sensitivity were 130 mm Hg for office systolic BP with 72% specificity for the diagnosis of MHT. The optimal cutoff value of 80 mm Hg for office diastolic BP provides 60% sensitivity and 68% specificity. Decision limits yielding 63% sensitivity were 150 mm Hg for office systolic BP with 72% specificity for the diagnosis of WCHT. The optimal cutoff value of 95 mm Hg for office diastolic BP provides 75% sensitivity and 51% specificity. The presence of MHT should be taken into account when increased c-f PWV is detected in the absence of office hypertension. The optimal office BP of 130/80 mm Hg provides the best sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of MHT. As regards the diagnosis of WCHT, the cutoff value of 150/95 mm Hg seems to provide the best option.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCardiovascular DiseasesCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceMaleMasked HypertensionMiddle AgedPulse Wave AnalysisRisk FactorsSensitivity and Specificityarterial stiffnessmasked hypertensiontrue hypertensionwhite coat hypertension

Identifiers

PMID31498516
PMCPMC8030454
OpenAlexW2972848969

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.