Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31499161›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V2019

Advanced in vitro lung-on-chip platforms for inhalation assays: From prospect to pipeline.

Arbel Artzy-Schnirman, Nina Hobi, Nicole Schneider-Daum, Olivier T Guenat, Claus-Michael Lehr, Josué Sznitman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Basic Science Perspective on Engineering and Modeling the Large Airways.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human Multi-CompartmentFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arbel Artzy-SchnirmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel.
Nina HobiARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Switzerland; AlveoliX AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Nicole Schneider-DaumHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Center for Infection Research (HZI), Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany; Department of Pharmacy, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Olivier T GuenatARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Switzerland; AlveoliX AG, Bern, Switzerland; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland; Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Claus-Michael LehrHelmholtz Institute for Pharmaceutical Research Saarland (HIPS), Helmholtz Center for Infection Research (HZI), Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany; Department of Pharmacy, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Josué SznitmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. Electronic address: sznitman@bm.technion.ac.il.

Funding

European Research Council 677772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With rapid advances in micro-fabrication processes and the availability of biologically-relevant lung cells, the development of lung-on-chip platforms is offering novel avenues for more realistic inhalation assays in pharmaceutical research, and thereby an opportunity to depart from traditional in vitro lung assays. As advanced models capturing the cellular pulmonary make-up at an air-liquid interface (ALI), lung-on-chips emulate both morphological features and biological functionality of the airway barrier with the ability to integrate respiratory breathing motions and ensuing tissue strains. Such in vitro systems allow importantly to mimic more realistic physiological respiratory flow conditions, with the opportunity to integrate physically-relevant transport determinants of aerosol inhalation therapy, i.e. recapitulating the pathway from airborne flight to deposition on the airway lumen. In this short opinion, we discuss such points and describe how these attributes are paving new avenues for exploring improved drug carrier designs (e.g. shape, size, etc.) and targeting strategies (e.g. conductive vs. respiratory regions) amongst other. We argue that while technical challenges still lie along the way in rendering in vitro lung-on-chip platforms more widespread across the general pharmaceutical research community, significant momentum is steadily underway in accelerating the prospect of establishing these as in vitro "gold standards".

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAerosolsBiological AssayDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLungModels, BiologicalParticle SizeRespirationRespiratory TherapyAerosolsDrug CarriersAerosolsCellular airway barrierInhalation assaysMicrofluidicsOrgan-on-chip

Identifiers

PMID31499161
PMCPMC7611793

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.