Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31505002›Full record

Trial reportTranslational behavioral medicine2020

Perceptions of uncertainties about carrier results identified by exome sequencing in a randomized controlled trial.

Kendall L Umstead, Paul K J Han, Katie L Lewis, Ilana M Miller, Charlotte L Hepler, Lydia J Thompson, Tyra G Wolfsberg, Anh-Dao Nguyen, Mark T Fredriksen, Gretchen Gibney and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kendall L UmsteadSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Paul K J HanCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Scarborough, ME, USA.
Katie L LewisMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Ilana M MillerMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Charlotte L HeplerSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lydia J ThompsonSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tyra G WolfsbergComputational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Anh-Dao NguyenComputational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark T FredriksenComputational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Gretchen GibneyComputational and Statistical Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Erin TurbittSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Leslie G BieseckerMedical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Barbara B BieseckerSocial and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Human Genome Research Institute · USMaine Medical Center · US

Funding

Genomic Ascertainment - Clinical and Behavioral AspectsZIAHG200387 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BIESECKER, LESLIE · 2013 to 2025
$15.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How individuals perceive uncertainties in sequencing results may affect their clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to explore perceptions of uncertainties in carrier results and how they relate to psychological well-being and health behavior. Post-reproductive adults (N = 462) were randomized to receive carrier results from sequencing through either a web platform or a genetic counselor. On average, participants received two results. Group differences in affective, evaluative, and clinical uncertainties were assessed from baseline to 1 and 6 months; associations with test-specific distress and communication of results were assessed at 6 months. Reductions in affective uncertainty (∆x̅ = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.53, 1.02) and evaluative uncertainty (∆x̅ = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.87) followed receipt of results regardless of randomization arm at 1 month. Participants in the web platform arm reported greater clinical uncertainty than those in the genetic counselor arm at 1 and 6 months; this was corroborated by the 1,230 questions asked of the genetic counselor and residual questions reported by those randomized to the web platform. Evaluative uncertainty was associated with a lower likelihood of communicating results to health care providers. Clinical uncertainty was associated with a lower likelihood of communicating results to children. Learning one's carrier results may reduce perceptions of uncertainties, though web-based return may lead to less reduction in clinical uncertainty in the short term. These findings warrant reinforcement of clinical implications to minimize residual questions and promote appropriate health behavior (communicating results to at-risk relatives in the case of carrier results), especially when testing alternative delivery models.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingExomeAdultChildCommunicationFemaleHumansMalePerceptionUncertaintyCarrier testingGenetic counselingGenome sequencingUncertaintyWeb platform

Identifiers

PMID31505002
PMCPMC7237536
OpenAlexW2970682363

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.