Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31506364›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM

Parent Perceptions of and Preferences for Participation in Child Health Research: Results from a Pediatric Practice-Based Research Network.

Stacey A Engster, Carrie Fascetti, Kristine Daw, Evelyn Cohen Reis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stacey A EngsterFrom the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pediatric PittNet, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, CF, KD, ECR); Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, ECR). engstersa2@upmc.edu.
Carrie FascettiFrom the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pediatric PittNet, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, CF, KD, ECR); Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, ECR).
Kristine DawFrom the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pediatric PittNet, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, CF, KD, ECR); Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, ECR).
Evelyn Cohen ReisFrom the University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pediatric PittNet, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, CF, KD, ECR); Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division of General Academic Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (SAE, ECR).

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecruitment efforts for child health research are often based on assumptions, therefore improving knowledge about parents' perceptions and preferences could enhance engagement. AIM/

objective1) To describe parents' perceptions about and preferences for participation in child health research within a pediatric practice-based research network (PBRN), and 2) to investigate any associations with the presence of on-site PBRN research staff, office location, and child age.

methodsWe conducted a 2-phase study with a convenience sample of parents from diverse office settings. Phase 1 was a qualitative assessment using semistructured, in-person interviews. Phase 2 consisted of a quantitative self-administered survey assessing: 1) perceptions of importance, benefits/motivations, and risks/barriers of child health research, and 2) preferences for recruitment method and enrollment location.

resultsParents (n = 627) uniformly perceived child health research to be important in prevention (89%), diagnosis (89%), and treatment (92%). They were motivated to participate most commonly by altruism and rarely by compensation. Parents perceived side effects (60%), discomfort (52%), and time (45%) as the main risks of participation. Most parents preferred to learn about research opportunities at their pediatric office (70%), and if interested, to enroll their child in their pediatric office (57%) or in their home (52%). Parents were significantly more altruistic and interested in participation in offices with on-site PBRN research staff and greater proximity to the University.

conclusionsChild health researchers could enhance participation by using recruitment resources and enrollment strategies that match parent preferences, including engagement by on-site PBRN staff.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth Services ResearchPediatricsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsAltruismChild HealthMotivationParentsPractice-based ResearchPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31506364
PMCPMC7890794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.