Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31507152›Full record

ReviewRevista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia2019

Clinical practice update of antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children.

J T Ramos, C A Romero, S Belda, F J Candel, B Carazo Gallego, A Fernández-Polo, L Ferreras Antolín, C Garrido Colino, M L Navarro, O Nef and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Liposomal amphotericin B prophylaxis in paediatrics: a systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Recent research on pharmacological prevention strategies for invasive fungal infection in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  8. Antifungal Prophylaxis With Posaconazole in Immunocompromised Children Younger Than 13 Years.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J T RamosJosé T. Ramos Amador, Departmento de Salud Pública y Materno-Infantil. Complutense University. Madrid. Hospital Clínico San Carlos. IdISSC Health Research Institute Madrid. Spain. josetora@ucm.es.
C A Romero
S Belda
F J Candel
B Carazo Gallego
A Fernández-Polo
L Ferreras Antolín
C Garrido Colino
M L Navarro
O Nef
P Olbright
E Rincón-López
J Ruiz Contreras
P Soler-Palacín
Fungal Infection Study Group of Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Disease (SEIP); Traslational Research Network in Pediatric Infectious Diseases (RITIP).
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rise in the number and types of immunosuppressed patients, invasive fungal infections (IFI) are an increasing and major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised adults and children. There is a broad group of pediatric patients at risk for IFI in whom primary and/or secondary antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) should be considered despite scant evidence. Pediatric groups at risk for IFI includes extremely premature infants in some settings, while in high-risk children with cancer receiving chemotherapy or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), AFP against yeast and moulds is usually recommended. For solid organ transplanted, children, prophylaxis depends on the type of transplant and associated risk factors. In children with primary or acquired immunodeficiency such as HIV or long-term immunosuppressive treatment, AFP depends on the type of immunodeficiency and the degree of immunosuppression. Chronic granulomatous disease is associated with a particular high-risk of IFI and anti-mould prophylaxis is always indicated. In contrast, AFP is not generally recommended in children with long stay in intensive care units. The choice of AFP is limited by the approval of antifungal agents in different age groups and by their pharmacokinetics characteristics. This document aims to review current available information on AFP in children and to provide a comprehensive proposal for each type of patient.

Indexed as

Immunocompromised HostAntifungal AgentsCandidiasisChildDrug MonitoringHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHIV InfectionsHumansImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmunosuppression TherapyInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, PediatricInvasive Fungal InfectionsNeoplasmsPneumonia, PneumocystisAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID31507152
PMCPMC6790888
OpenAlexW2994704762

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.