Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31539368›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

Natural variation in Arabidopsis shoot branching plasticity in response to nitrate supply affects fitness.

Maaike de Jong, Hugo Tavares, Raj K Pasam, Rebecca Butler, Sally Ward, Gilu George, Charles W Melnyk, Richard Challis, Paula X Kover, Ottoline Leyser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenotypic Plasticity inEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Seasons and shape: inflorescences from autumn to summer.Journal of experimental botany · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. SProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maaike de JongSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2104-936X
Hugo TavaresSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-2726
Raj K PasamSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0908-1882
Rebecca ButlerSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sally WardSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5520-1331
Gilu GeorgeDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8347-0977
Charles W MelnykSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3251-800X
Richard ChallisDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3502-1122
Paula X KoverDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, United Kingdom.
Ottoline LeyserSainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2161-3829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity of organisms to tune their development in response to environmental cues is pervasive in nature. This phenotypic plasticity is particularly striking in plants, enabled by their modular and continuous development. A good example is the activation of lateral shoot branches in Arabidopsis, which develop from axillary meristems at the base of leaves. The activity and elongation of lateral shoots depends on the integration of many signals both external (e.g. light, nutrient supply) and internal (e.g. the phytohormones auxin, strigolactone and cytokinin). Here, we characterise natural variation in plasticity of shoot branching in response to nitrate supply using two diverse panels of Arabidopsis lines. We find extensive variation in nitrate sensitivity across these lines, suggesting a genetic basis for variation in branching plasticity. High plasticity is associated with extreme branching phenotypes such that lines with the most branches on high nitrate have the fewest under nitrate deficient conditions. Conversely, low plasticity is associated with a constitutively moderate level of branching. Furthermore, variation in plasticity is associated with alternative life histories with the low plasticity lines flowering significantly earlier than high plasticity lines. In Arabidopsis, branching is highly correlated with fruit yield, and thus low plasticity lines produce more fruit than high plasticity lines under nitrate deficient conditions, whereas highly plastic lines produce more fruit under high nitrate conditions. Low and high plasticity, associated with early and late flowering respectively, can therefore be interpreted alternative escape vs mitigate strategies to low N environments. The genetic architecture of these traits appears to be highly complex, with only a small proportion of the estimated genetic variance detected in association mapping.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantMeristemNitratesPhenotypePlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant ShootsArabidopsis ProteinsNitrates

Identifiers

PMID31539368
PMCPMC6774567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.