Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554255›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2019

The Molecular Effects of Ionizing Radiations on Brain Cells: Radiation Necrosis vs. Tumor Recurrence.

Vincenzo Cuccurullo, Giuseppe Danilo Di Stasio, Giuseppe Lucio Cascini, Gianluca Gatta, Cataldo Bianco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Radiology Services and Occupational Radiation Anxiety in Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neurological side effects of radiation therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A new in vitro model appliedScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Molecular imaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenzo CuccurulloNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Precision Medicine-Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli 80138, Italy. vincenzo.cuccurullo@unicampania.it.
Giuseppe Danilo Di StasioNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Precision Medicine-Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli 80138, Italy. d.distasio91@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5044-6831
Giuseppe Lucio CasciniDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy. cascini@unicz.it.
Gianluca GattaNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Precision Medicine-Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli 80138, Italy. gianluca.gatta@unicampania.it.
Cataldo BiancoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro 88100, Italy. bianco@unicz.it.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nervous system (CNS) is generally resistant to the effects of radiation, but higher doses, such as those related to radiation therapy, can cause both acute and long-term brain damage. The most important results is a decline in cognitive function that follows, in most cases, cerebral radionecrosis. The essence of radio-induced brain damage is multifactorial, being linked to total administered dose, dose per fraction, tumor volume, duration of irradiation and dependent on complex interactions between multiple brain cell types. Cognitive impairment has been described following brain radiotherapy, but the mechanisms leading to this adverse event remain mostly unknown. In the event of a brain tumor, on follow-up radiological imaging often cannot clearly distinguish between recurrence and necrosis, while, especially in patients that underwent radiation therapy (RT) post-surgery, positron emission tomography (PET) functional imaging, is able to differentiate tumors from reactive phenomena. More recently, efforts have been done to combine both morphological and functional data in a single exam and acquisition thanks to the co-registration of PET/MRI. The future of PET imaging to differentiate between radionecrosis and tumor recurrence could be represented by a third-generation PET tracer already used to reveal the spatial extent of brain inflammation. The aim of the following review is to analyze the effect of ionizing radiations on CNS with specific regard to effect of radiotherapy, focusing the attention on the mechanism underling the radionecrosis and the brain damage, and show the role of nuclear medicine techniques to distinguish necrosis from recurrence and to early detect of cognitive decline after treatment.

Indexed as

brain radiation therapyDOPAFETmethionineMisonecrosisneuroinflammationPET/MRIrecurrenceTSPO

Identifiers

PMID31554255
PMCPMC6963489
OpenAlexW2976996935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.