Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554919›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Plasma metabolites associated with homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance: metabolite-model design and external validation.

Pablo Hernández-Alonso, Jesús García-Gavilán, Lucía Camacho-Barcia, Anders Sjödin, Thea T Hansen, Jo Harrold, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Jason C G Halford, Silvia Canudas, Mònica Bulló

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pablo Hernández-AlonsoHuman Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Spain.
Jesús García-GavilánHuman Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3707-5255
Lucía Camacho-BarciaHuman Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Spain.
Anders SjödinDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thea T HansenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0324-4698
Jo HarroldDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jordi Salas-SalvadóHuman Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-7459
Jason C G HalfordDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Silvia CanudasHuman Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Spain.
Mònica BullóHuman Nutrition Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili, University Hospital Sant Joan de Reus, Rovira i Virgili University, Reus, Spain. monica.bullo@urv.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0218-7046
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different plasma metabolites have been related to insulin resistance (IR). However, there is a lack of metabolite models predicting IR with external validation. The aim of this study is to identify a multi-metabolite model associated to the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-IR values. We performed a cross-sectional metabolomics analysis of samples collected from overweight and obese subjects from two independent studies. The training step was performed in 236 subjects from the SATIN study and validated in 102 subjects from the GLYNDIET study. Plasma metabolomics profile was analyzed using three different approaches: GC/quadrupole-TOF, LC/quadrupole-TOF, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Associations between metabolites and HOMA-IR were assessed using elastic net regression analysis with a leave-one-out cross validation (CV) and 100 CV runs. HOMA-IR was analyzed both as linear and categorical (median or lower versus higher than the median). Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed based on metabolites' weighted models. A set of 30 metabolites discriminating extremes of HOMA-IR were consistently selected. These metabolites comprised some amino acids, lipid species and different organic acids. The area under the curve (AUC) for the discrimination between HOMA-IR extreme categories was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.74-0.90), based on the multi-metabolite model weighted with the regression coefficients of metabolites in the validation dataset. We identified a set of metabolites discriminating between extremes of HOMA-IR and able to predict HOMA-IR with high accuracy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHomeostasisHumansInsulin ResistanceMaleMetabolomicsMiddle AgedOverweightPlasmaROC CurveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31554919
PMCPMC6761105
OpenAlexW2975959480

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.