Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569393›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Selecting an Appropriate Animal Model of Depression.

Yuanzhen Hao, Huixiang Ge, Mengyun Sun, Yun Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuanzhen HaoJoint Program of Nanchang University and Queen Mary University of London, Nanchang 330006, China. qmhorizon@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8910-4791
Huixiang GeDepartment of Physiology, The Basic Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China. huixiang.ge@qq.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2446-8172
Mengyun SunDepartment of Physiology, The Basic Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China. 605697873@qq.com.
Yun GaoDepartment of Physiology, The Basic Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China. gaoyun@ncu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2519-9979

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81760152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression has become one of the most severe psychiatric disorders and endangers the health of living beings all over the world. In order to explore the molecular mechanism that underlies depression, different kinds of animal models of depression are used in laboratory experiments. However, a credible and reasonable animal model that is capable of imitating the pathologic mechanism of depression in mankind has yet to be found, resulting in a barrier to further investigation of depression. Nevertheless, it is possible to explain the pathologic mechanism of depression to a great extent by a rational modeling method and behavioral testing. This review aims to provide a reference for researchers by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of some common animal depression models.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalDepressionDepressive DisorderDisease Models, AnimalHumansanimal modelbehavior testdepression

Identifiers

PMID31569393
PMCPMC6801385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.