Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31569778›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2019

An Update on Isolation Methods for Proteomic Studies of Extracellular Vesicles in Biofluids.

Jing Li, Xianqing He, Yuanyuan Deng, Chenxi Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing LiSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Science, Wuhan University of Technology, 122 luoshilu, Wuhan 430070, China. lij@whut.edu.cn.
Xianqing HeSchool of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Life Science, Wuhan University of Technology, 122 luoshilu, Wuhan 430070, China. 714769257@whut.edu.cn.
Yuanyuan DengSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China. 213150742@seu.edu.cn.
Chenxi YangSchool of Biological Science & Medical Engineering, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing 210096, China. yangchenxi@seu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-704X

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2018IVB043ANational Natural Science Foundation of China 21703163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bilayer enclosed particles which present in almost all types of biofluids and contain specific proteins, lipids, and RNA. Increasing evidence has demonstrated the tremendous clinical potential of EVs as diagnostic and therapeutic tools, especially in biofluids, since they can be detected without invasive surgery. With the advanced mass spectrometry (MS), it is possible to decipher the protein content of EVs under different physiological and pathological conditions. Therefore, MS-based EV proteomic studies have grown rapidly in the past decade for biomarker discovery. This review focuses on the studies that isolate EVs from different biofluids and contain MS-based proteomic analysis. Literature published in the past decade (2009.1-2019.7) were selected and summarized with emphasis on isolation methods of EVs and MS analysis strategies, with the aim to give an overview of MS-based EV proteomic studies and provide a reference for future research.

Indexed as

ProteomeProteomicsExtracellular VesiclesHumansMass SpectrometryProteomebiofluidextracellular vesiclesisolation methodsmass spectrometryproteomics

Identifiers

PMID31569778
PMCPMC6803898

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.