Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31570534›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

Toward Robust Functional Neuroimaging Genetics of Cognition.

Julia Uddén, Annika Hultén, Katarina Bendtz, Zachary Mineroff, Katerina S Kucera, Arianna Vino, Evelina Fedorenko, Peter Hagoort, Simon E Fisher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The opioid system in depression.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Composition is the Core Driver of the Language-selective Network.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia UddénMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 6525 XD, Julia.Uddén@mpi.nl simon.fisher@mpi.nl.
Annika HulténMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 6525 XD.
Katarina BendtzDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden, SE-106 91.
Zachary MineroffBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MA 02139-4307.
Katerina S KuceraMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 6525 XD.
Arianna VinoMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 6525 XD.
Evelina FedorenkoBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MA 02139-4307.
Peter HagoortMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 6525 XD.
Simon E FisherMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, 6525 XD, Julia.Uddén@mpi.nl simon.fisher@mpi.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3132-1996
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · NLMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USCenter for Applied Linguistics · USStockholm University · SE

Funding

Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
The neural architecture of pragmatic processingR01DC016607 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
fMRI investigations of the functional architecture of the language systemR00HD057522 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA · 2014 to 2016
$738k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD057522NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016607NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A commonly held assumption in cognitive neuroscience is that, because measures of human brain function are closer to underlying biology than distal indices of behavior/cognition, they hold more promise for uncovering genetic pathways. Supporting this view is an influential fMRI-based study of sentence reading/listening by Pinel et al. (2012), who reported that common DNA variants in specific candidate genes were associated with altered neural activation in language-related regions of healthy individuals that carried them. In particular, different single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of

Indexed as

Brain MappingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultCognitionFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReadingReproducibility of ResultsSpeech PerceptionYoung AdultForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP2 protein, humanfMRIFOXP2individual differencesKIAA0319/TTRAP/THEM2languageneuroimaging genetics

Identifiers

PMID31570534
PMCPMC6820208
OpenAlexW2979017639

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.