Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31573338›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology2019

Stem Cells, Cell Therapies, and Bioengineering in Lung Biology and Diseases 2017. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Amy L Ryan, Laertis Ikonomou, Sadaf Atarod, Deniz A Bölükbas, Jennifer Collins, Rob Freishtat, Finn Hawkins, Sarah E Gilpin, Franziska E Uhl, Juan Jose Uriarte and 2 more

Abstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Stem cells, cell therapies, and bioengineering in lung biology and diseases 2023.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lung regeneration: implications of the diseased niche and ageing.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Deniz A BölükbasORCID 0000-0002-5034-4245
Juan Jose Uriarte
Daniel J Weiss

Funding

Stem Cell, Cell Therapies and Bioengineering in Lung Biology and Lung DiseasesR13HL139002 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI WEISS, DANIEL J · 2017 to 2017
$30k
NHLBI NIH HHS R13 HL139002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, in collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), the Alpha-1 Foundation, the American Thoracic Society, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, the European Respiratory Society, the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy, and the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, convened a workshop titled "Stem Cells, Cell Therapies, and Bioengineering in Lung Biology and Diseases" from July 24 through 27, 2017, at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont. The conference objectives were to review and discuss current understanding of the following topics:

Indexed as

BioengineeringCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyStem CellsClinical Trials as TopicExtracellular VesiclesForecastingHealth PrioritiesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsIntersectoral CollaborationLungLung DiseasesResearchSmall BusinessStem Cell NicheTissue Engineeringbioengineeringcell therapyendogenous lung progenitor cellsextracellular vesiclesinduced pluripotent stem cells

Identifiers

PMID31573338
PMCPMC6775946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.