ArticleJAMA cardiology2019
Statin Use in Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease According to 5 Major Guidelines for Sensitivity, Specificity, and Number Needed to Treat.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Egg and Dietary Cholesterol Intake and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Pooled it
- Metabolic Syndrome in an Aging Society - Role of Oxidant-Antioxidant Imbalance and Inflammation Markers in Disentangling Atherosclerosis.Clinical interventions in aging · 2021Pooled it
- Omega-3 fatty acids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Preventative therapy for breast cancer: a clinical experience.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Trial
- Effect of a Comprehensive Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Intervention in Persons With Serious Mental Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Gender Differences in Statin Discontinuation and Adherence Among Privately Insured People with HIV in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026 · on this mapObservational
- Exploring the prevalence and clinical impact of carotid plaque burden by Doppler ultrasound in lung cancer screening participants with limited coronary artery calcification.European radiology · 2026Article
- Podcast Episode 2: Heart Failure Management in Patients with Diabetes for Endocrinologists, Primary Care Physicians, and Noncardiologist Clinicians: Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- Effect of Statin Use on Mortality in Individuals With Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2026Article
- Implications of five different risk models in primary prevention guidelines.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Observational
- Article
- Preventive Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Interactions With Health Care in Patients Who Develop Premature Coronary Artery Disease.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Impact of Statin Therapy on Diabetes Incidence: Implications for Primary Prevention.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Team and Electronic Health Record Features and Burnout Among Family Physicians.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Impact of Guideline-Directed Statin Prescriptions on Cardiovascular Outcomes by Race in a Real-World Primary Prevention Cohort.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Statins in the Cause and Prevention of Cancer: Confounding by Indication and Mediation by Rhabdomyolysis and Phosphate Toxicity.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Individualized Dose-Response to Statins Associated with Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk.Nature cardiovascular research · 2024Article
- Closing the Gaps in Care of Dyslipidemia: Revolutionizing Management with Digital Health and Innovative Care Models.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Five major guidelines on statin use for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) have been published since 2014: the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE; 2014), US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF; 2016), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS; 2016), European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS; 2016), and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA; 2018). Objective: To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and estimated number needed to treat (NNT10) to prevent 1 ASCVD event in 10 years according to statin criteria from the 5 guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based contemporary cohort study. Analyses were performed in the Copenhagen General Population Study, with a mean follow-up time of 10.9 years. We included 45 750 individuals aged 40 to 75 years. The participants were enrolled between 2003 and 2009 and were all free of ASCVD at baseline. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2019, and August 4, 2019. Exposures: Statin treatment according to guideline criteria. We assumed a 25% relative reduction of ASCVD events per 38 mg/dL (to convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.0259) reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity and specificity for ASCVD events and the NNT10 to prevent 1 ASCVD event according to guideline criteria. Results: Median age at baseline examination was 56 years, and 43% of participants were men (n = 19 870 of 45 750). During follow-up, we observed 4156 ASCVD events. Overall, 44% of individuals in Copenhagen General Population Study were statin eligible with CCS (n = 19 953 of 45 750), 42% with ACC/AHA (n = 19 400 of 45 750), 40% with NICE (n = 19 400 of 45 750), 31% with USPSTF (n = 13 966 of 45 750), and 15% with ESC/EAS (n = 6870 of 45 750). Sensitivity and specificity for ASCVD events were 68% (n = 2815 of 4156) and 59% (n = 24 456 of 41 594) for CCS, 70% (n = 2889 of 4156) and 60% (n = 25 083 of 41 594) for ACC/AHA, 68% (n = 2815 of 4156) and 63% (n = 26 213 of 41 594) for NICE, 57% (n = 2377 of 4156) and 72% (n = 30 005 of 41 594) for USPSTF, and 24% (n = 1001 of 4156) and 86% (n = 35 725 of 41 594) for ESC/EAS. The NNT10 to prevent 1 ASCVD using moderate-intensity and high-intensity statin therapy, respectively, was 32 and 21 for CCS criteria, 30 and 20 for ACC/AHA criteria, 30 and 20 for NICE criteria, 27 and 18 for USPSTF criteria, and 29 and 20 for ESC/EAS criteria. Conclusions and Relevance: With similar NNT10 to prevent 1 event, the CCS, ACC/AHA, and NICE guidelines correctly assign statin therapy to many more of the individuals who later develop ASCVD compared with the USPSTF and ESC/EAS guidelines. Our results therefore suggest that the CCS, ACC/AHA, or NICE guidelines may be preferred for primary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.