Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31586106›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Optical Resolution Photoacoustic Microscopy of Ovary and Fallopian Tube.

Bin Rao, Xiandong Leng, Yifeng Zeng, Yixiao Lin, Ruimin Chen, Qifa Zhou, Andrea R Hagemann, Lindsay M Kuroki, Carolyn K McCourt, David G Mutch and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Current trends in the characterization and monitoring of vascular response to cancer therapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  6. TowardsFundamental research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optoacoustic imaging in endocrinology and metabolism.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bin RaoBiomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-3110
Xiandong LengBiomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Yifeng ZengBiomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Yixiao LinBiomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Ruimin ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5338-359X
Qifa ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Andrea R HagemannDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Lindsay M KurokiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Carolyn K McCourtDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
David G MutchDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Matthew A PowellDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Ian S HagemannDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Quing ZhuBiomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, 63130, USA. zhu.q@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1837-2588
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Near Infrared Diffused Light Imaging with Ultrasound Guidance: Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ResponseR01EB002136 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ZHU, QUING · 2003 to 2016
$3.4M
Co-registered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging for non-invasive ovarian canR01CA151570 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BREWER, MOLLY A., ZHU, QUING · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA151570NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers, but is poorly amenable to preoperative diagnosis. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of "optical biopsy," using high-optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy (OR-PAM) to quantify the microvasculature of ovarian and fallopian tube tissue. The technique is demonstrated using excised human ovary and fallopian tube specimens imaged immediately after surgery. Quantitative parameters are derived using Amira software. The parameters include three-dimensional vascular segment count, total volume and length, which are associated with tumor angiogenesis. Qualitative results of OR-PAM demonstrate that malignant ovarian tissue has larger and more tortuous blood vessels as well as smaller vessels of different sizes, while benign and normal ovarian tissue has smaller vessels of uniform size. Quantitative analysis shows that malignant ovaries have greater tumor vessel volume, length and number of segments, as compared with benign and normal ovaries. The vascular pattern of benign fallopian tube is different than that of benign ovarian tissue. Our initial results demonstrate the potential of OR-PAM as an imaging tool for fast assessment of ovarian tissue and fallopian tube and could avoid unnecessary surgery if the risk of the examined ovary is extremely low.

Indexed as

AdolescentCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFallopian TubesFemaleHumansMicroscopyOvarian NeoplasmsOvary

Identifiers

PMID31586106
PMCPMC6778126
OpenAlexW2978332275

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.