Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31606857›Full record

SynthesisUpdates in surgery2020

Uterine manipulator in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: safety and usefulness.

Yara Abdel Khalek, Roger Bitar, Costas Christoforou, Simone Garzon, Alessandro Tropea, Antonio Biondi, Zaki Sleiman

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Updates in surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Manipulator-Free Versus Manipulator-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Are Outcomes Comparable in Experienced Hands?Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yara Abdel KhalekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Roger BitarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lebanese American University, Zahar Street, Beirut, Lebanon.
Costas ChristoforouChristoforou Clinic, Larnaca, Cyprus.
Simone GarzonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Alessandro TropeaDepartment for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT(Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy.
Antonio BiondiDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Zaki SleimanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon. zakinexus@hotmail.com.
Lebanese American University · LBIstituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione · ITOspedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese · ITSaint Joseph University · LBUniversity of Catania · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of uterine manipulators in facilitating total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). A literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, UpToDate, SpringerLink, ClinicalKey and Elsevier ScienceDirect databases was performed, and articles describing TLH with or without the use of uterine manipulators were retrieved. Complications related to the use of uterine manipulators are numerous, and although uterine manipulator seems to facilitate TLH, the procedure without a uterine manipulator seems to have a comparable safety and effectiveness, although evidence based on a direct comparison of the two approaches is limited without available controlled trials. Uterine manipulator may provide support in cases of large uteri, severe endometriosis, recto vaginal adhesions and regional anesthesia, while its use may increase complications in cases of vaginal stenosis and nulliparity. Therefore, to perform TLH, the surgeon should individualize for each case if uterine manipulator is needed and which manipulator best suits the surgical procedure requirements and case characteristics. Further studies comparing the two approaches are mandatory.

Indexed as

Surgical InstrumentsBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansHysterectomyLaparoscopyOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsSafetyUterine NeoplasmsUterusHysterectomyIntraoperative complicationsLaparoscopySurgical InstrumentsUterine manipulator

Identifiers

PMID31606857
OpenAlexW2979593491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.