Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31625041›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2020

A Systems-Level Approach to Improving Medication Adherence in Hypertensive Latinos: a Randomized Control Trial.

Antoinette Schoenthaler, Franzenith de la Calle, Maria Pitaro, Audrey Lum, William Chaplin, Jazmin Mogavero, Milagros C Rosal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03560596 (Helping Hypertensive Latinos to Improve Medication Adherence), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03560596 nacompletednot on this map

Helping Hypertensive Latinos to Improve Medication Adherence

TypeinterventionalSponsorNYU Langone HealthRan2013 to 2017Enrolled119ConditionsHypertensionArmsAdherence Intervention, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antoinette SchoenthalerDepartment of Population Health, Center for Healthful Behavior Change, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Antoinette.Schoenthaler@nyumc.org.
Franzenith de la CalleDepartment of Population Health, Center for Healthful Behavior Change, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Maria PitaroUnion Health Center, New York, NY, USA.
Audrey LumUnion Health Center, New York, NY, USA.
William ChaplinDepartment of Psychology, St. Johns University, Jamaica, NY, USA.
Jazmin MogaveroDepartment of Psychology, St. Johns University, Jamaica, NY, USA.
Milagros C RosalPreventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
New York University · USSt. John's University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite numerous interventions targeting medication adherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension, practice-based trials in Latino patients are scant.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of a systems-level adherence intervention, delivered by medical assistants (MAs), versus a comparison condition on medication adherence and blood pressure (BP) in 119 hypertensive Latino patients who were initially non-adherent to their antihypertensive medications. STUDY

designRandomized control trial.

participantsPatients (50% women; mean age, 61 years) were recruited from April 2013 to August 2015 in a community-based practice in New York.

interventionSystems-level approach that included an office system component built into the electronic health record and a provider support component consisting of nine MA-delivered health coaching sessions for improving medication adherence. The comparison group received the standard health coaching procedures followed at the clinic.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was rate of medication adherence measured by an electronic monitoring device (EMD) across 6 months. The secondary outcomes were self-reported medication adherence measured by the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and BP reduction from baseline to 6 months. KEY

resultsAdherence as measure by EMD worsened for both groups (p = 0.04) with no between-group difference (- 9.6% intervention and - 6.6% control, p = 0.66). While systolic BP improved in both groups, the difference between groups was not significant (- 6 mmHg in intervention vs. - 2.7 mmHg in control, p = 0.34). In contrast, the intervention group had a greater improvement in self-reported adherence (mean change 1.98 vs. 1.26, p = 0.03) when measured using the MMAS-8.

conclusionsAmong Latinos with poorly controlled BP who were non-adherent to their antihypertensive medications, a systems-level intervention did not improve adherence as measured by EMD nor blood pressure. However, many patients reported challenges to using the EMD. Improvements in self-reported adherence suggest that this measure captures different aspects of adherence behavior than EMD. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT03560596.

Indexed as

HypertensionAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedNew YorkAntihypertensive AgentshypertensionLatinomedication adherenceteam care

Identifiers

PMID31625041
PMCPMC6957668
OpenAlexW2981222147

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.