ArticleOncology reports2019
IFN‑β sensitizes TRAIL‑induced apoptosis by upregulation of death receptor 5 in malignant glioma cells.
Article in Oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Helping Apo2L/TRAIL in the Battle: Synergistic Therapeutic Approaches for Cancer Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- USP5 in cancer: a therapeutic window into metabolism and drug resistance.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Electronic Cigarette Exposure Increases the Severity of Influenza a Virus Infection via TRAIL Dysregulation in Human Precision-Cut Lung Slices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Engineered sTRAIL-armed MSCs overcome STING deficiency to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy for immune checkpoint blockade.Cell death & disease · 2022Article
- Prognostic value and immune relevancy of a combined autophagy-, apoptosis- and necrosis-related gene signature in glioblastoma.BMC cancer · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor‑related apoptosis‑inducing ligand (TRAIL), a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, induces apoptosis in cancer cells by binding to its receptors, death receptor 4 (DR4) and DR5, without affecting normal cells, and is therefore considered to be a promising antitumor agent for use in cancer treatment. However, several studies have indicated that most glioma cell lines display resistance to TRAIL‑induced apoptosis. To overcome such resistance and to improve the efficacy of TRAIL‑based therapies, identification of ideal agents for combinational treatment is important for achieving rational clinical treatment in glioblastoma patients. The main aim of this study was to investigate whether interferon‑β (IFN‑β) (with its pleiotropic antitumor activities) could sensitize malignant glioma cells to TRAIL‑induced apoptosis using glioma cell lines. TRAIL exhibited a dose‑dependent antitumor effect in all of the 7 types of malignant glioma cell lines, although the intensity of the effect varied among the cell lines. In addition, combined treatment with TRAIL (low clinical dose: 1 ng/ml) and IFN‑β (clinically relevant concentration: 10 IU/ml) in A‑172, AM‑38, T98G, U‑138MG and U‑251MG demonstrated a more marked antitumor effect than TRAIL alone. Furthermore, the antitumor effect of the combined treatment with TRAIL and IFN‑β may be enhanced via an extrinsic apoptotic system, and upregulation of DR5 was revealed to play an important role in this process in U‑138MG cells. These findings provide an experimental basis to suggest that combined treatment with TRAIL and IFN‑β may offer a new therapeutic strategy for malignant gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.