Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31647821›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2019

mHealth intervention "ImTeCHO" to improve delivery of maternal, neonatal, and child care services-A cluster-randomized trial in tribal areas of Gujarat, India.

Dhiren Modi, Nishith Dholakia, Ravi Gopalan, Sethuraman Venkatraman, Kapilkumar Dave, Shobha Shah, Gayatri Desai, Shamim A Qazi, Anju Sinha, Ravindra Mohan Pandey and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dhiren ModiCommunity Health Department, SEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.
Nishith DholakiaCommissionerate of Health, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Ravi GopalanArgusoft India Ltd., Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-7790
Sethuraman VenkatramanArgusoft India Ltd., Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1922-5715
Kapilkumar DaveCommunity Health Department, SEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3815-7292
Shobha ShahCommunity Health Department, SEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-2297
Gayatri DesaiCommunity Health Department, SEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.
Shamim A QaziDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-9259
Anju SinhaDivision of Reproductive Biology, Maternal & Child Health, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Ravindra Mohan PandeyDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ankit AnandPopulation Research Centre, Institute of Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2454-0696
Shrey DesaiCommunity Health Department, SEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5565-5392
Pankaj ShahCommunity Health Department, SEWA Rural, Jhagadia, Bharuch, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0533-7337
Society for Education Welfare and Action Rural · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGovernment of Gujarat · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INInstitute for Social and Economic Change · INWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coverage of community-based maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) services remains low, especially in hard-to-reach areas. We evaluated the effectiveness of a mobile-phone-and web-based application, Innovative Mobile-phone Technology for Community Health Operations (ImTeCHO), as a job aid to the government's Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) and Primary Health Center (PHC) staff to improve coverage of MNCH services in rural tribal communities of Gujarat, India. METHODS AND

findingsThis open cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 22 PHCs in six tribal blocks of Bharuch and Narmada districts in India. The ImTeCHO mobile-phone-and web-based application included various technology-based job aids to facilitate scheduling of home visits, screening for complications, counseling during home visits, and supportive supervision by PHC staff. Primary outcome indicators were a composite index calculated based on coverage of important MNCH services and coverage of at least two home visitations by ASHA within the first week of birth. Primary analysis was intention to treat (ITT). Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to account for clustering. Eleven PHCs each were randomly allocated to the intervention (280 ASHAs, population: 234,134) and control (281 ASHAs, population: 242,809) arms. The intervention was implemented from February, 2016 to January, 2017. At the end of the implementation, 6,493 mothers were surveyed. Most of the surveyed women were tribal (5,571, 85.8%), and reported having a government-issued certificate for living below poverty line (4,916, 75.7%). The coverage of at least two home visits within first week of birth was 32.4% in the intervention clusters compared to 22.9% in the control clusters (adjusted effect size 10.2 [95% CI: 6.4, 14.0], p < 0.001). Mean number of home visits within first week of birth was 1.11 and 0.80 for intervention and control clusters, respectively (adjusted effect size 0.34 [95% CI: 0.23, 0.45], p < 0.001). The composite coverage index was 43.0% in the intervention clusters compared to 38.5% (adjusted effect size 4.9 [95% CI: 0.2, 9.5], p = 0.03) in the control clusters. There were substantial improvements in coverage home visits by ASHAs during antenatal period (adjusted effect size 15.7 [95% CI: 11.0, 20.4], p < 0.001), postnatal period (adjusted effect size 6.4, [95% CI: 3.2, 9.6], p <0.001), early initiation of breastfeeding (adjusted effect size 7.8 [95% CI: 4.2, 11.4], p < 0.001), and exclusive breastfeeding (adjusted effect size 13.4 [95% CI: 8.9, 17.9], p < 0.001). Number of infant and neonatal deaths was similar in the two arms in the ITT analysis. The limitations of the study include potential risk of inaccuracies in reporting events that occurred during pregnancy by the mothers and the duration of intervention being 12 months, which might be considered short.

conclusionsIn this study, we found that use of ImTeCHO mobile- and web-based application as a job aid by government ASHAs and PHC staff improved coverage and quality of MNCH services in hard-to-reach areas. Supportive supervision, change management, and timely resolution of technology-related issues were critical implementation considerations to ensure adherence to the intervention.

trial registrationStudy was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry of India (www.ctri.nic.in). Trial number: CTRI/2015/06/005847. The trial was registered (prospective) on 3 June, 2015. First enrollment was done on 26 August, 2015.

Indexed as

AdultCell PhoneChild Health ServicesCluster AnalysisCommunity Health WorkersCounselingFemaleHome Care ServicesHouse CallsHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornInternetMaleMaternal Health ServicesNeonatology

Identifiers

PMID31647821
PMCPMC6812744
OpenAlexW2981724259

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.