Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31650090›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)

Alleviation of paclitaxel-induced mechanical hypersensitivity and hyperalgesic priming with AMPK activators in male and female mice.

Kufreobong E Inyang, Timothy A McDougal, Eric D Ramirez, Marisa Williams, Geoffroy Laumet, Annemieke Kavelaars, Cobi J Heijnen, Michael Burton, Gregory Dussor, Theodore J Price

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endocannabinoid biosynthetic enzymes regulate pain response via LKB1-AMPK signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Highly specific σProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Highly specific σbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mitochondria and sensory processing in inflammatory and neuropathic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kufreobong E InyangUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
Timothy A McDougalUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
Eric D RamirezUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
Marisa WilliamsUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
Geoffroy LaumetMD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Symptom Research, United States.
Annemieke KavelaarsMD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Symptom Research, United States.
Cobi J HeijnenMD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Symptom Research, United States.
Michael BurtonUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
Gregory DussorUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
Theodore J PriceUniversity of Texas at Dallas, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Center for Advanced Pain Studies, United States.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translation Control of Pain PlasticityR01NS065926 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI PRICE, THEODORE J. · 2010 to 2023
$5.7M
Neuroimmune Mechanisms of Recovery from Comorbid Depression and Chronic PainR01NS073939 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DANTZER, ROBERT, HEIJNEN, COBI J · 2011 to 2020
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065926NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an energy-sensing kinase that has emerged as a novel therapeutic target for pain due to its ability to inhibit mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) and mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, two signaling pathways that are linked to pain promotion after injury as well as the development of hyperalgesic priming. MAPK and mTOR signaling are also implicated in chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We conducted a series of experiments to gain further insight into how AMPK activators might best be used to treat pain in both sexes in the setting of CIPN from paclitaxel. We also assessed whether hyperalgesic priming emerges from paclitaxel treatment and if this can be prevented by AMPK targeting. AMPK can be pharmacologically activated indirectly through regulation of upstream kinases like liver kinase B1 (LKB1) or directly using positive allosteric modulators. We used the indirect AMPK activators metformin and narciclasine, both of which have been shown to reduce pain in preclinical models but with much different potencies and different efficacies depending on the sex of the animal. We used the direct AMPK activator MK8722 because it is the most potent and specific such activator described to date. Here, the AMPK activators were used in 2 different treatment paradigms. First the drugs were given concurrently with paclitaxel to test whether they prevent mechanical hypersensitivity. Second the AMPK activators were given after the completion of paclitaxel treatment to test whether they reverse established mechanical hypersensitivity. Consistent with our previously published findings with metformin, narciclasine (1 mg/kg) produced an anti-hyperalgesic effect, preventing paclitaxel-induced neuropathy in outbred mice of both sexes. In contrast to metformin, narciclasine also reversed mechanical hypersensitivity in established CIPN. Both metformin (200 mg/kg) and narciclasine prevented the development of hyperalgesic priming induced by paclitaxel treatment. MK8722 (30 mg/kg) had no effect on mechanical hypersensitivity caused by paclitaxel in either the prevention or reversal treatment paradigms. However, MK8722 did attenuate hyperalgesic priming in male and female mice. We conclude that paclitaxel induces robust hyperalgesic priming that is prevented by AMPK targeting and that narciclasine is a particularly attractive candidate for further development as a CIPN treatment.

Indexed as

AMPKCIPNMetforminMK8722NarciclasinePain

Identifiers

PMID31650090
PMCPMC6804652
OpenAlexW2975104701

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.