Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31652849›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Nutraceutical Compounds as Sensitizers for Cancer Treatment in Radiation Therapy.

Marco Calvaruso, Gaia Pucci, Rosa Musso, Valentina Bravatà, Francesco P Cammarata, Giorgio Russo, Giusi I Forte, Luigi Minafra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pilot study to assess the early cardiac safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for intra- and para-cardiac tumours.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  7. Curcumin's Radioprotective Effects on Zebrafish Embryos.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Differential Radiomodulating Action ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco CalvarusoIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. marco.calvaruso@ibfm.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2387-8273
Gaia PucciIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. gaia.pucci@ibfm.cnr.it.
Rosa MussoIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. rosa.musso@ibfm.cnr.it.
Valentina BravatàIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. valentina.bravata@ibfm.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9778-9252
Francesco P CammarataIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. francesco.cammarata@ibfm.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0554-6649
Giorgio RussoIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. giorgio.russo@ibfm.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1493-1087
Giusi I ForteIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. giusi.forte@ibfm.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0161-9828
Luigi MinafraIstituto di Bioimmagini e Fisiologia Molecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBFM-CNR), 90015 Cefalù (PA), Italy. luigi.minafra@ibfm.cnr.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3112-4519
Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The improvement of diagnostic techniques and the efficacy of new therapies in clinical practice have allowed cancer patients to reach a higher chance to be cured together with a better quality of life. However, tumors still represent the second leading cause of death worldwide. On the contrary, chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) still lack treatment plans which take into account the biological features of tumors and depend on this for their response to treatment. Tumor cells' response to RT is strictly-connected to their radiosensitivity, namely, their ability to resist and to overcome cell damage induced by ionizing radiation (IR). For this reason, radiobiological research is focusing on the ability of chemical compounds to radiosensitize cancer cells so to make them more responsive to IR. In recent years, the interests of researchers have been focused on natural compounds that show antitumoral effects with limited collateral issues. Moreover, nutraceuticals are easy to recover and are thus less expensive. On these bases, several scientific projects have aimed to test also their ability to induce tumor radiosensitization both in vitro and in vivo. The goal of this review is to describe what is known about the role of nutraceuticals in radiotherapy, their use and their potential application.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsRadiotherapyRadiation-Sensitizing Agentscancernutraceuticalsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31652849
PMCPMC6861933
OpenAlexW2981334729

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.