Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659622›Full record

ReviewPituitary2020

Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas; a review of the evidence.

Elena V Varlamov, José Miguel Hinojosa-Amaya, Maria Fleseriu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pituitary · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elena V VarlamovDepartments of Medicine (Endocrinology) and Neurological Surgery, and Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code CH8N, 3303 SW Bond Ave, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
José Miguel Hinojosa-AmayaDepartments of Medicine (Endocrinology) and Neurological Surgery, and Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code CH8N, 3303 SW Bond Ave, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Maria FleseriuDepartments of Medicine (Endocrinology) and Neurological Surgery, and Northwest Pituitary Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Mail Code CH8N, 3303 SW Bond Ave, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. fleseriu@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-6289
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review aimed to evaluate data on the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas.

methodsRecent literature about prolactinoma behavior and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of prolactinomas is reviewed.

resultsA review of evidence regarding prolactinoma pituitary MRI follow-up; techniques and sequences, recent data on possible gadolinium retention, the role and a review of T2-weighted images in the identification of prolactinomas and frequently encountered clinical scenarios, as well as MRI correlation with prolactin secretion, tumor growth and prediction of response to medical therapy are presented.

conclusionThe underlying decision to perform serial imaging in prolactinoma patients should be individualized on a case-by-case basis. Future studies should focus on alternative imaging methods and/or contract agents.

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPituitary NeoplasmsProlactinProlactinomaProlactinGadoliniumLactotroph adenomaMagnetic resonance imagingProlactinomaT2-weighted

Identifiers

PMID31659622
OpenAlexW2982548820

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.