Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31661946›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Middle-Aged and Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial of the Acute Effects of Treadmill Walking on Glycemic Control.

Romeu Mendes, Nelson Sousa, José Luís Themudo-Barata, Victor Machado Reis

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Acute Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romeu MendesEPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal. romeuduartemendes@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3806-438X
Nelson SousaNorthern Region Health Administration, 4000-477 Porto, Portugal. nelsonzizou@gmail.com.
José Luís Themudo-BarataFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal. jlthemudobarata@gmail.com.
Victor Machado ReisDepartment of Sport Sciences, Exercise and Health, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal. vmreis@utad.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-1414
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PTUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the acute effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on glycemic control in middle-aged and older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), using treadmill walking as aerobic exercise mode.

methodsFifteen patients with T2D (60.25 ± 3.14 years; glycated hemoglobin 7.03 ± 0.33%; medicated with metformin and/or gliptins), participated in a randomized controlled crossover trial. They underwent three experimental conditions (treadmill walking HIIT session (5 × (3 min at 70% of heart rate reserve (HRR) + 3 min at 30% HRR)); treadmill walking MICT session (30 min at 50% HRR); and a control session of rest (CON)) in random order and in the postprandial state. Measurements of capillary blood glucose (BG) were taken immediately before, during, and until 50 min after the experimental conditions.

resultsBoth HIIT and MICT treadmill walking sessions reduced BG levels during exercise and laboratory 50 min recovery period compared to CON (time*condition interaction effect;

conclusionsTreadmill walking HIIT seems a safe and more effective exercise strategy on immediate acute glycemic control compared with MICT in middle-aged and older patients with T2D under therapy with metformin and/or gliptins. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN09240628.

Indexed as

AgedBlood GlucoseCross-Over StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ExerciseFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHeart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Conditioning, HumanWalkingBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinacute effectscrossover trialexerciseglycemic controlhigh-intensity interval trainingphysical activitytype 2 diabeteswalking

Identifiers

PMID31661946
PMCPMC6862460
OpenAlexW2982219597

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.