Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31664548›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2021

"Smoking paradox" is not true in patients with ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bo Li, Dan Li, Jing-Feng Liu, Lin Wang, Bao-Zhu Li, Xiu-Juan Yan, Wei Liu, Kun Wu, Ruo-Lan Xiang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The impact of smoking on third-degree atrioventricular block outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bo LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China. 13691089898@139.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-9086
Dan LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Jing-Feng LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Lin WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Bao-Zhu LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Xiu-Juan YanDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Kun WuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Hepingli Hospital, No.18 North Street Hepingli, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100013, China.
Ruo-Lan XiangDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cardiovascular Sciences, Ministry of Education, and Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Receptors Research, Peking University School of Basic Medical Sciences, No.38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. xiangrl@bjmu.edu.cn.
Beijing Anding Hospital · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIschemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of death from vascular diseases. Studies have found that smoking increases the risk of ischemic stroke, but the association of smoking with the outcome of IS remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the effect of smoking on the prognosis of IS.

methodsWe searched four electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and Web of science for papers, published before January 2019. In this meta-analysis, Review Manager 5.3 software was used to calculate for the pooled estimate effect, as well as the inverse-variance method for pooled mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) of incidence in two groups of population.

resultsA total of 14,789 citations were identified during the literature search, 21 studies were included in the meta-analyses after screening. The full-adjusted OR of poor prognostic outcome in smoking and nonsmoking patients with stroke was pooled as 0.96 (95% CI 0.77-1.21), suggested that smoking or not has no impact on prognosis of IS. The pooled MD of onset age between smoking and nonsmoking IS patients was - 10.05 (- 12.91, - 7.19), indicated that smoking causes first onset of IS to occur 10 years earlier.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis showed that smoking was not a protective factor for poor prognosis of IS. Smoking patients with IS are 10 years younger than nonsmoking patients at time of the first onset of stroke.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIschemic StrokeStrokeChildHumansPrognosisSmokingIschemic strokeMeta-analysisPoor outcomePrognosisSmoking

Identifiers

PMID31664548
PMCPMC8179908
OpenAlexW2982462773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.