Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31681179›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2019

Bioactive Peptides Against Fungal Biofilms.

Karen G N Oshiro, Gisele Rodrigues, Bruna Estéfani D Monges, Marlon Henrique Cardoso, Octávio Luiz Franco

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05368948 (The Assessment of Antimicrobial Peptides Against Fungal Infection), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05368948 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Assessment of Antimicrobial Peptides Against Fungal Infection

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsFungal Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Morphotype-specific susceptibility toMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Repositioning Antimicrobial Peptides Against WHO-Priority Fungi.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Antifungal Innate Immunity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Conjugation of CRAMPInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Two promisingFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent advances in the development of therapeutic peptides.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen G N OshiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Patologia Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Gisele RodriguesCentro de Análises Proteômicas e Bioquímicas, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Genômicas e Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Bruna Estéfani D MongesS-Inova Biotech, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Marlon Henrique CardosoS-Inova Biotech, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Dom Bosco, Campo Grande, Brazil.
Octávio Luiz FrancoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Patologia Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections caused by invasive fungal biofilms have been widely associated with high morbidity and mortality rates, mainly due to the advent of antibiotic resistance. Moreover, fungal biofilms impose an additional challenge, leading to multidrug resistance. This fact, along with the contamination of medical devices and the limited number of effective antifungal agents available on the market, demonstrates the importance of finding novel drug candidates targeting pathogenic fungal cells and biofilms. In this context, an alternative strategy is the use of antifungal peptides (AFPs) against fungal biofilms. AFPs are considered a group of bioactive molecules with broad-spectrum activities and multiple mechanisms of action that have been widely used as template molecules for drug design strategies aiming at greater specificity and biological efficacy. Among the AFP classes most studied in the context of fungal biofilms, defensins, cathelicidins and histatins have been described. AFPs can also act by preventing the formation of fungal biofilms and eradicating preformed biofilms through mechanisms associated with cell wall perturbation, inhibition of planktonic fungal cells' adhesion onto surfaces, gene regulation and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Thus, considering the critical scenario imposed by fungal biofilms and associated infections and the application of AFPs as a possible treatment, this review will focus on the most effective AFPs described to date, with a core focus on antibiofilm peptides, as well as their efficacy

Indexed as

antifungal peptidesantimicrobial peptidesfungal biofilmsfungal infectionsmechanisms of action

Identifiers

PMID31681179
PMCPMC6797862

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.