Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31700682›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2019

Effects of water immersion on gait initiation: part II of a case series after incomplete spinal cord injury.

Andresa R Marinho-Buzelli, Ana Maria Forti Barela, B Catharine Craven, Kei Masani, Hossein Rouhani, Milos R Popovic, Mary C Verrier

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Aquatic Therapy after Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: Gait Initiation Analysis Using Inertial Sensors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andresa R Marinho-Buzelli1KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7426-631X
Ana Maria Forti Barela2Institute of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Cruzeiro do Sul University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
B Catharine Craven1KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8234-6803
Kei Masani1KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0207-3241
Hossein Rouhani5Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.
Milos R Popovic1KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON Canada.
Mary C Verrier1KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study design: Case series. Objectives: This case series describes how the aquatic environment influences gait initiation in terms of the center of pressure (COP) excursion, impulses, trunk acceleration, and perceptions of participants with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). Setting: Tertiary Rehabilitation Hospital, Ontario, Canada. Methods: Five individuals with iSCI (four cervical injuries/one thoracic injury, AIS D) participated in the study. Baseline clinical balance was evaluated by Berg Balance Scale and Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test. Participants initiated gait on a waterproof force plate and walked ~4 steps, in water and on land. COP trajectories during anticipatory and execution phases, impulses, and trunk acceleration parameters were investigated. Perceptions of walking in both environments were obtained using an interview. Results: COP trajectory was prominently longer when individuals stepped forward. A decrease in velocity of COP was observed predominantly in the AP direction during stepping. Non-normalized vertical impulses decreased as the AP impulses increased, in water compared to land. Upper to lower trunk acceleration ratios showed how water resistance influenced the lower trunk acceleration. Most of participants reported that walking in water was challenging, but safer than on land. Conclusions: Participants with higher balance function seemed to have more pronounced changes in anticipatory and execution phases' duration, length and velocity of COP. A faster anticipatory phase and a slower execution phase were observed in water than on land. Participants walked in water using a different trunk control strategy than on land and reported no fear of falling when walking in water versus land.

Indexed as

ImmersionWaterAccelerationAdultAgedCervical VertebraeFemaleGaitHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostural BalanceSpinal Cord InjuriesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeWaterRehabilitationSpinal cord diseases

Identifiers

PMID31700682
PMCPMC6821750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.