Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703256›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Sphingosine 1-Phosphate (S1P)/ S1P Receptor Signaling and Mechanotransduction: Implications for Intrinsic Tissue Repair/Regeneration.

Chiara Sassoli, Federica Pierucci, Sandra Zecchi-Orlandini, Elisabetta Meacci

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Potential Vitamin E Signaling Mediators in Skeletal Muscle.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Ying and Yang of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signalling within the Bone.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiara SassoliDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-Section of Anatomy and Histology, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1337-0938
Federica PierucciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio"-Unit of Molecular Biology, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0196-8112
Sandra Zecchi-OrlandiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-Section of Anatomy and Histology, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5932-7118
Elisabetta MeacciDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio"-Unit of Molecular Biology, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

ENTE CASSA RISPARMIO DI FIRENZE 2017/17940Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2017-2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue damage, irrespective from the underlying etiology, destroys tissue structure and, eventually, function. In attempt to achieve a morpho-functional recover of the damaged tissue, reparative/regenerative processes start in those tissues endowed with regenerative potential, mainly mediated by activated resident stem cells. These cells reside in a specialized niche that includes different components, cells and surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM), which, reciprocally interacting with stem cells, direct their cell behavior. Evidence suggests that ECM stiffness represents an instructive signal for the activation of stem cells sensing it by various mechanosensors, able to transduce mechanical cues into gene/protein expression responses. The actin cytoskeleton network dynamic acts as key mechanotransducer of ECM signal. The identification of signaling pathways influencing stem cell mechanobiology may offer therapeutic perspectives in the regenerative medicine field. Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor (S1PR) signaling, acting as modulator of ECM, ECM-cytoskeleton linking proteins and cytoskeleton dynamics appears a promising candidate. This review focuses on the current knowledge on the contribution of S1P/S1PR signaling in the control of mechanotransduction in stem/progenitor cells. The potential contribution of S1P/S1PR signaling in the mechanobiology of skeletal muscle stem cells will be argued based on the intriguing findings on S1P/S1PR action in this mechanically dynamic tissue.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularRegenerationAnimalsCytoskeletonExtracellular MatrixHumansLysophospholipidsMyoblasts, SkeletalSphingosineSphingosine-1-Phosphate ReceptorsLysophospholipidsSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphateSphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptorscytoskeletonextracellular matrix (ECM)mechanotransductionsatellite cellsskeletal musclesphingolipidssphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1PRs)stem cellsstiffnesstissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID31703256
PMCPMC6888058
OpenAlexW2985494698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.