Evidence mapPaperPMID 31714813Full record

GuidelineCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2019

2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.

Donald E Casey, Randal J Thomas, Vivek Bhalla, Yvonne Commodore-Mensah, Paul A Heidenreich, Dhaval Kolte, Paul Muntner, Sidney C Smith, John A Spertus, John R Windle and 2 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. A Blueprint for Building a Renal Denervation Program.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What Constitutes Adequate Control of High Blood Pressure? Current Considerations.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Donald E Casey
Randal J Thomas
Vivek Bhalla
Yvonne Commodore-Mensah
Paul A Heidenreich
Dhaval Kolte
Paul Muntner
Sidney C Smith
John A Spertus
John R Windle
Gregory D Wozniak
Boback Ziaeian

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001882 · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · 2025 to 2025
$1.0M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17SDG33630113NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

American Heart AssociationBlood Pressure DeterminationConsensusEvidence-Based MedicineHumansHypertensionOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePredictive Value of TestsQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAHA Scientific Statementshigh blood pressurehypertensionperformance measuresquality indicatorsquality measures

Identifiers

PMID31714813
PMCPMC7717926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.