Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31732144›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2019

Continuous Dynamic Modeling of Regulated Cell Adhesion: Sorting, Intercalation, and Involution.

Jason M Ko, Daniel Lobo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  7. Formalizing Phenotypes of Regeneration.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Computational Systems Biology of Morphogenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason M KoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel LoboDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland; Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: lobo@umbc.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-cell adhesion is essential for tissue growth and multicellular pattern formation and crucial for the cellular dynamics during embryogenesis and cancer progression. Understanding the dynamical gene regulation of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) responsible for the emerging spatial tissue behaviors is a current challenge because of the complexity of these nonlinear interactions and feedback loops at different levels of abstraction-from genetic regulation to whole-organism shape formation. To extend our understanding of cell and tissue behaviors due to the regulation of adhesion molecules, here we present a novel, to our knowledge, model for the spatial dynamics of cellular patterning, growth, and shape formation due to the differential expression of CAMs and their regulation. Capturing the dynamic interplay between genetic regulation, CAM expression, and differential cell adhesion, the proposed continuous model can explain the complex and emergent spatial behaviors of cell populations that change their adhesion properties dynamically because of inter- and intracellular genetic regulation. This approach can demonstrate the mechanisms responsible for classical cell-sorting behaviors, cell intercalation in proliferating populations, and the involution of germ layer cells induced by a diffusing morphogen during gastrulation. The model makes predictions on the physical parameters controlling the amplitude and wavelength of a cellular intercalation interface, as well as the crucial role of N-cadherin regulation for the involution and migration of cells beyond the gradient of the morphogen Nodal during zebrafish gastrulation. Integrating the emergent spatial tissue behaviors with the regulation of genes responsible for essential cellular properties such as adhesion will pave the way toward understanding the genetic regulation of large-scale complex patterns and shapes formation in developmental, regenerative, and cancer biology.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionModels, BiologicalGastrulationGene Expression Regulation

Identifiers

PMID31732144
PMCPMC6895740
OpenAlexW2982500113

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.