Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31733285›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroscience methods2020

Companion animal models of neurological disease.

Brittanie Partridge, John H Rossmeisl

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the One Health Paradigm in Male Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittanie PartridgeVeterinary and Comparative Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA; Brain Tumor Center of Excellence, Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center Blvd, NRC 405, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
John H RossmeislVeterinary and Comparative Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA; Brain Tumor Center of Excellence, Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical Center Blvd, NRC 405, Winston Salem, NC, 27157, USA. Electronic address: jrossmei@vt.edu.
Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Sub-component for Institution # 16-01848 Novel moleculary targeted therapy of GBMP01CA207206 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBINSKI, WALDEMAR · 2017 to 2021
$9.0M
High-frequency Irreversible Electroporation (H-FIRE) combinatorial GBM treatmentR01CA213423 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL, VERBRIDGE, SCOTT S · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Molecular Combinatorial Therapy of Glioblastoma MultiformeR01CA139099 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DEBINSKI, WALDEMAR · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA207206NCI NIH HHS P30 CA012197NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139099NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical translation of novel therapeutics that improve the survival and quality of life of patients with neurological disease remains a challenge, with many investigational drug and device candidates failing in advanced stage clinical trials. Naturally occurring inherited and acquired neurological diseases, such as epilepsy, inborn errors of metabolism, brain tumors, spinal cord injury, and stroke occur frequently in companion animals, and many of these share epidemiologic, pathophysiologic and clinical features with their human counterparts. As companion animals have a relatively abbreviated lifespan and genetic background, are immunocompetent, share their environment with human caregivers, and can be clinically managed using techniques and tools similar to those used in humans, they have tremendous potential for increasing the predictive value of preclinical drug and device studies. Here, we review comparative features of spontaneous neurological diseases in companion animals with an emphasis on neuroimaging methods and features, illustrate their historical use in translational studies, and discuss inherent limitations associated with each disease model. Integration of companion animals with naturally occurring disease into preclinical studies can complement and expand the knowledge gained from studies in other animal models, accelerate or improve the manner in which research is translated to the human clinic, and ultimately generate discoveries that will benefit the health of humans and animals.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEpilepsyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansPetsQuality of LifeAnimal modelsEpilepsyMovement disordersNeurodegenerative diseaseNeuro-oncologySpinal cord injuryStroke

Identifiers

PMID31733285
PMCPMC6942211
OpenAlexW2987823876

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.