Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735151›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Birdsong as a window into language origins and evolutionary neuroscience.

Caitlin M Aamodt, Madza Farias-Virgens, Stephanie A White

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What do mammals have to say about the neurobiology of acoustic communication?Molecular psychology : brain, behavior, and society · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What can animal communication teach us about human language?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caitlin M AamodtNeuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.
Madza Farias-VirgensMolecular, Cellular and Integrative Physiology Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.
Stephanie A WhiteNeuroscience Interdepartmental Program, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Formation and Function of Circuitry for Vocal LearningR01MH070712 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WHITE, STEPHANIE ANN · 2005 to 2017
$3.1M
Training in Psychological Intervention ResearchT32MH070326 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STRAUMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2006 to 2010
$337k
The Role of Histone Variant H3.3 and miR-128 in Learned Vocal CommunicationF31MH110209 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AAMODT, CAITLIN MARIE · 2016 to 2019
$108k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH110209NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070712NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH070326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and songbirds share the key trait of vocal learning, manifested in speech and song, respectively. Striking analogies between these behaviours include that both are acquired during developmental critical periods when the brain's ability for vocal learning peaks. Both behaviours show similarities in the overall architecture of their underlying brain areas, characterized by cortico-striato-thalamic loops and direct projections from cortical neurons onto brainstem motor neurons that control the vocal organs. These neural analogies extend to the molecular level, with certain song control regions sharing convergent transcriptional profiles with speech-related regions in the human brain. This evolutionary convergence offers an unprecedented opportunity to decipher the shared neurogenetic underpinnings of vocal learning. A key strength of the songbird model is that it allows for the delineation of activity-dependent transcriptional changes in the brain that are driven by learned vocal behaviour. To capitalize on this advantage, we used previously published datasets from our laboratory that correlate gene co-expression networks to features of learned vocalization within and after critical period closure to probe the functional relevance of genes implicated in language. We interrogate specific genes and cellular processes through converging lines of evidence: human-specific evolutionary changes, intelligence-related phenotypes and relevance to vocal learning gene co-expression in songbirds. This article is part of the theme issue 'What can animal communication teach us about human language?'

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionLanguageNeurosciencesAnimalsBrainHumansNeuronsSexual MaturationSongbirdsSpeechVocalization, AnimalBengalese finchevolutionary neuroscienceneotenysongbirdspeechzebra finch

Identifiers

PMID31735151
PMCPMC6895547
OpenAlexW2983882681

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.