Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31735295›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2019

A Fast and Accurate Method for Genome-wide Scale Phenome-wide G × E Analysis and Its Application to UK Biobank.

Wenjian Bi, Zhangchen Zhao, Rounak Dey, Lars G Fritsche, Bhramar Mukherjee, Seunggeun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Schizophrenia: from mechanism to therapy.Science China. Life sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  8. Many roads to a gene-environment interaction.American journal of human genetics · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Statistical methods for gene-environment interaction analysis.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wenjian BiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Zhangchen ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Rounak DeyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Lars G FritscheDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Seunggeun LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: leeshawn@umich.edu.

Funding

University of Michigan ERC-supplement (TRT)T42OH008455 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L · 2005 to 2025
$32.3M
Statistical and computational methods for rare variant association analysisR01HG008773 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG008773NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The etiology of most complex diseases involves genetic variants, environmental factors, and gene-environment interaction (G × E) effects. Compared with marginal genetic association studies, G × E analysis requires more samples and detailed measure of environmental exposures, and this limits the possible discoveries. Large-scale population-based biobanks with detailed phenotypic and environmental information, such as UK-Biobank, can be ideal resources for identifying G × E effects. However, due to the large computation cost and the presence of case-control imbalance, existing methods often fail. Here we propose a scalable and accurate method, SPAGE (SaddlePoint Approximation implementation of G × E analysis), that is applicable for genome-wide scale phenome-wide G × E studies. SPAGE fits a genotype-independent logistic model only once across the genome-wide analysis in order to reduce computation cost, and SPAGE uses a saddlepoint approximation (SPA) to calibrate the test statistics for analysis of phenotypes with unbalanced case-control ratios. Simulation studies show that SPAGE is 33-79 times faster than the Wald test and 72-439 times faster than the Firth's test, and SPAGE can control type I error rates at the genome-wide significance level even when case-control ratios are extremely unbalanced. Through the analysis of UK-Biobank data of 344,341 white British European-ancestry samples, we show that SPAGE can efficiently analyze large samples while controlling for unbalanced case-control ratios.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansLogistic ModelsMalePhenomicsPhenotypeUnited Kingdombiobank data analysisgene-environment interactionsaddlepoint approximationUK Biobankunbalanced case-controlratios

Identifiers

PMID31735295
PMCPMC6904814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.