Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31740847›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2019

The genomic footprint of sexual conflict.

Ahmed Sayadi, Alvaro Martinez Barrio, Elina Immonen, Jacques Dainat, David Berger, Christian Tellgren-Roth, Björn Nystedt, Göran Arnqvist

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex-Specific Dominance of Gene Expression in Seed Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. On the resolution of sexual conflict over shared traits.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Multivariate genetic architecture reveals testosterone-driven sexual antagonism in contemporary humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ahmed SayadiAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Alvaro Martinez BarrioDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5064-2093
Elina ImmonenEvolutionary Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jacques DainatDepartment of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6629-0173
David BergerAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-6109
Christian Tellgren-RothDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, National Genomics Infrastructure, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Björn NystedtDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Bioinformatics Infrastructure Sweden, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Göran ArnqvistAnimal Ecology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Goran.Arnqvist@ebc.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3501-3376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes with sex-biased expression show a number of unique properties and this has been seen as evidence for conflicting selection pressures in males and females, forming a genetic 'tug-of-war' between the sexes. However, we lack studies of taxa where an understanding of conflicting phenotypic selection in the sexes has been linked with studies of genomic signatures of sexual conflict. Here, we provide such a link. We used an insect where sexual conflict is unusually well understood, the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus, to test for molecular genetic signals of sexual conflict across genes with varying degrees of sex-bias in expression. We sequenced, assembled and annotated its genome and performed population resequencing of three divergent populations. Sex-biased genes showed increased levels of genetic diversity and bore a remarkably clear footprint of relaxed purifying selection. Yet, segregating genetic variation was also affected by balancing selection in weakly female-biased genes, while male-biased genes showed signs of overall purifying selection. Female-biased genes contributed disproportionally to shared polymorphism across populations, while male-biased genes, male seminal fluid protein genes and sex-linked genes did not. Genes showing genomic signatures consistent with sexual conflict generally matched life-history phenotypes known to experience sexually antagonistic selection in this species. Our results highlight metabolic and reproductive processes, confirming the key role of general life-history traits in sexual conflict.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsFemaleGenomeGenomicsHumansMalePhenotype

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.