Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31741069›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2019

User Centered Design to Improve Information Exchange in Diabetes Care Through eHealth : Results from a Small Scale Exploratory Study.

Giuseppe Fico, Antonio Martinez-Millana, Jan-Paul Leuteritz, Alessio Fioravanti, Maria Eugenia Beltrán-Jaunsarás, Vicente Traver, Maria Teresa Arredondo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppe FicoPhotonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, Life Supporting Technologies Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. gfico@lst.tfo.upm.es.
Antonio Martinez-MillanaITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1056-5067
Jan-Paul LeuteritzErgonomics and Vehicle Interaction, Fraunhofer-Institute for Industrial Engineering (IAO), Berlin, Germany.
Alessio FioravantiPhotonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, Life Supporting Technologies Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Eugenia Beltrán-JaunsarásPhotonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, Life Supporting Technologies Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Vicente TraverITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Maria Teresa ArredondoPhotonics Technology and Bioengineering Department, Life Supporting Technologies Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ESFraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering · DE

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 216270.3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heterogeneity of people with diabetes makes maintaining blood glucose control and achieving therapy adherence a challenge. It is fundamental that patients get actively involved in the management of the disease in their living environments. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the use and acceptance of a self-management system for diabetes developed with User Centered Design Principles in community settings. Persons with diabetes and health professionals were involved the design, development and evaluation of the self-management system; which comprised three iterative cycles: scenario definition, user archetype definition and system development. A comprehensive system was developed integrating modules for the management of blood glucose levels, medication, food intake habits, physical activity, diabetes education and messaging. The system was adapted for two types of principal users (personas): Type 1 Diabetes user and Type 2 Diabetes user. The system was evaluated by assessing the use, the compliance, the attractiveness and perceived usefulness in a multicenter randomized pilot study involving 20 patients and 24 treating professionals for a period of four weeks. Usage and compliance of the co-designed system was compared during the first and the last two weeks of the study, showing a significantly improved behaviour of patients towards the system for each of the modules. This resulted in a successful adoption by both type of personas. Only the medication module showed a significantly different use and compliance (p= 0.01) which can be explained by the different therapeutic course of the two types of diabetes. The involvement of patients to make their own decisions and choices form design stages was key for the adoption of a self-management system for diabetes.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Health Information ExchangeHumansInformation SystemsReminder SystemsTelemedicineCo-designDiabetes managementmHealthPersonal health recordsUser centered design

Identifiers

PMID31741069
OpenAlexW2983468182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.