Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31745072›Full record

Trial reportTranslational psychiatry2019

High-dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) improves attention and vigilance in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and low endogenous EPA levels.

Jane Pei-Chen Chang, Kuan-Pin Su, Valeria Mondelli, Senthil Kumaran Satyanarayanan, Hui-Ting Yang, Yi-Ju Chiang, Hui-Ting Chen, Carmine M Pariante

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jane Pei-Chen ChangDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-0928
Kuan-Pin SuDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK. cobolsu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4501-2502
Valeria MondelliDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Senthil Kumaran SatyanarayananDepartment of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-4943
Hui-Ting YangCollege of Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Ju ChiangDepartment of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hui-Ting ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Carmine M ParianteDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9132-5091
King's College London · GBChina Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

Department of Health NHRI-EX105-10528NIMedical Research Council G108/603Medical Research Council MR/J002739/1Medical Research Council MR/L014815/1Medical Research Council MR/N029488/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No studies have examined the relationship between endogenous polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) levels and treatment response to PUFAs. We conducted a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing the effects of high-dose eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 1.2 g) and placebo on cognitive function (continuous performance test) in n = 92 youth (age 6-18-years-old) with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Blood erythrocytes PUFAs were measured before and after treatment, to examine the effects of baseline endogenous EPA levels on treatment response and the effects of EPA treatment on PUFAs levels. Secondary measures included other ADHD symptoms, emotional symptoms, and levels of plasma high-sensitivity c-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Overall, EPA group improved more than placebo group on focused attention (variability, Effect size (ES) = 0.38, p = 0.041); moreover, within youth with the lowest baseline endogenous EPA levels, EPA group improved more than placebo group in another measure of focused attention (hit reaction time, HRT, ES = 0.89, p = 0.015) and in vigilance (HRT interstimulus interval changes, HRTISIC, ES = 0.83, p = 0.036). Interestingly, EPA group improved less than placebo group in impulsivity (commission errors), both overall and in youth with the highest baseline EPA levels, who also showed less improvement in other ADHD and emotional symptoms. EPA increased blood erythrocytes EPA by 1.6-fold but not DHA levels, and did not affect hs-CRP and BDNF plasma levels. In conclusion, EPA treatment improves cognitive symptoms in ADHD youth, especially if they have a low baseline endogenous EPA level, while youth with high EPA levels may be negatively affected by this treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildCognitionDouble-Blind MethodEicosapentaenoic AcidFemaleHumansMaleTaiwanTreatment OutcomeEicosapentaenoic Acid

Identifiers

PMID31745072
PMCPMC6864068
OpenAlexW2983464518

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.