Evidence mapPaperPMID 31749144Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

Diabetes, metformin and cancer risk in myotonic dystrophy type I.

Rotana Alsaggaf, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Youjin Wang, Diane Marie M St George, Min Zhan, Kathryn R Wagner, Sania Amr, Mark H Greene, Shahinaz M Gadalla

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Skeletal muscle disorders as risk factors for type 2 diabetes.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 in the COVID-19 era.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Targeting Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 with Metformin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rotana AlsaggafClinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-8789
Ruth M PfeifferBiostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-2698
Youjin WangClinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0001-5841-4183
Diane Marie M St GeorgeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Min ZhanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.
Kathryn R WagnerHugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD.
Sania AmrDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-1193-877X
Mark H GreeneClinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Shahinaz M GadallaClinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
National Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

Clinical Genetic Studies of Familial and Hereditary Cancer SyndromesZIACP010144 · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · 2025 to 2025
$4.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type I (DM1) is an autosomal dominant multisystem disorder characterized by myotonia and muscle weakness. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cancer have been shown to be part of the DM1 phenotype. Metformin, a well-established agent for the management of T2D, is thought to have cancer-preventive effects in the general population. In our study, we aimed to assess the association between T2D, metformin use and the risk of cancer in DM1 patients. We identified a cohort of 913 DM1 patients and an age-, sex- and clinic-matched cohort of 12,318 DM1-free controls from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large primary care records database. We used Cox regression models to assess cancer risk in T2D patients who were metformin users or nonusers compared to patients without T2D. Separate analyses were conducted for DM1 patients and controls. T2D was more prevalent in DM1 than in controls (8% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001). DM1 patients with T2D, compared to those without T2D, were more likely to develop cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-10.97; p = 0.02), but not if they were treated with metformin (HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.06-3.35; p = 0.42). Among controls, we observed no significant associations between T2D and cancer risk in either users or nonusers of Metformin (HR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.91-1.79; p = 0.16 and HR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.72-1.79; p = 0.59, respectively). These results show an association between T2D and cancer risk in DM1 patients and may provide new insights into the possible benefits of Metformin use in DM1.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMetforminMiddle AgedMyotonic DystrophyNeoplasmsMetformincancerCPRDdiabetesmetforminmyotonic dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID31749144
PMCPMC7336337
OpenAlexW2991506152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.