Trial reportDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020

Liraglutide for perioperative management of hyperglycaemia in cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre randomized superiority trial.

Abraham H Hulst, Maarten J Visscher, Marc B Godfried, Bram Thiel, Bastiaan M Gerritse, Thierry V Scohy, R Arthur Bouwman, Mark G A Willemsen, Markus W Hollmann, Benedikt Preckel and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph read 1 number from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

1number the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Glycemic controldirection of benefit for this outcome is not defined · head-to-head · t2dfeeds one cell of the map
Δ 18.05.90 to 30.0P = 0.003
In the liraglutide group, 55 (43%) patients required additional insulin compared with 80 (61%) in the placebo group and absolute difference 18% (95% confidence interval 5.9-30.0, P = 0.003).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 89 favour the treatment, 16 find no difference, 10 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.90replicated · 63 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT017204463,297 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.66-0.80 to -0.52
NCT036893742,274 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.20
NCT039879191,879 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.51-0.64 to -0.38
NCT026078651,864 enrolled · 2016
Δ -0.50-0.60 to -0.40
NCT013360231,663 enrolled · 2011
Treatment contrast -0.64-0.75 to -0.53
NCT040178321,441 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.20-0.30 to -0.10
NCT018365231,398 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.20-0.32 to -0.07
NCT019301881,231 enrolled · 2013
Δ -1.06-1.21 to -0.91
NCT007344741,202 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.71-0.87 to -0.55
NCT020581471,170 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.19
NCT003184611,091 enrolled · 2006
Δ -1.09-1.30 to -0.88
NCT021289321,089 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.81-0.96 to -0.67

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. National Heart Center Perfusion Guidelines.Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Abraham H HulstDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9101-7649
Maarten J VisscherDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc B GodfriedDepartment of Anesthesiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bram ThielDepartment of Anesthesiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan M GerritseDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Thierry V ScohyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
R Arthur BouwmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospitals, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Mark G A WillemsenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospitals, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benedikt PreckelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Hans DeVriesDepartment of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9196-9906
Jeroen HermanidesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
GLOBE Study Group
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLOLVG · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

Novo Nordisk
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

aimsMost cardiac surgery patients, with or without diabetes, develop perioperative hyperglycaemia, for which intravenous insulin is the only therapeutic option. This is labour-intensive and carries a risk of hypoglycaemia. We hypothesized that preoperative administration of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide reduces the number of patients requiring insulin for glycaemic control during cardiac surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, balanced (1:1), multicentre randomized, superiority trial, adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery in four Dutch tertiary hospitals were randomized to receive 0.6 mg subcutaneous liraglutide on the evening before surgery and 1.2 mg after induction of anaesthesia or matching placebo. Blood glucose was measured hourly and controlled using an insulin-bolus algorithm. The primary outcome was insulin administration for blood glucose >8.0 mmol/L in the operating theatre. Research pharmacists used centralized, stratified, variable-block, randomization software. Patients, care providers and study personnel were blinded to treatment allocation.

resultsBetween June 2017 and August 2018, 278 patients were randomized to liraglutide (139) or placebo (139). All patients receiving at least one study drug injection were included in the intention-to-treat analyses (129 in the liraglutide group, 132 in the placebo group). In the liraglutide group, 55 (43%) patients required additional insulin compared with 80 (61%) in the placebo group and absolute difference 18% (95% confidence interval 5.9-30.0, P = 0.003). Dose and number of insulin injections and mean blood glucose were all significantly lower in the liraglutide group. We observed no difference in the incidence of hypoglycaemia, nausea and vomiting, mortality or postoperative complications.

conclusionsPreoperative liraglutide, compared with placebo, reduces insulin requirements while improving perioperative glycaemic control during cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HyperglycemiaAdultBlood GlucoseDouble-Blind MethodGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutideTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsLiraglutide

Identifiers

PMID31749275
PMCPMC7079116
OpenAlexW2990247880

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.