ArticleMedicine2019
Conservative interventions for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review protocol.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparing Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy with or without Retroperitoneal Tunneling.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the downward descent of vaginal walls, affecting the health of 32% to 76% female patients. Conservative interventions are considered as priority before seeking help from surgery. We plan to make the systematic review to assess the effectiveness of conservative intervention for adult women with POP.
methodsStudies will be searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2017. Primary outcomes are specific POP-related symptom, severity of prolapse, Prolapse-related, and general health-related quality of life and other non-POP-specific symptoms.
resultsThe data will be synthesized if possible using MD, SMD or RR. A descriptive analysis will be made if the data cannot be synthesized. DISCUSSION: The systematic review might provide solid evidence for the treatment of POP by conservative intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.