Evidence mapPaperPMID 31783708Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Controversies in the Science of Sedentary Behaviour and Health: Insights, Perspectives and Future directions from the 2018 Queensland Sedentary Behaviour Think Tank.

Stuart J H Biddle, Jason A Bennie, Katrien De Cocker, David Dunstan, Paul A Gardiner, Genevieve N Healy, Brigid Lynch, Neville Owen, Charlotte Brakenridge, Wendy Brown and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Objectively Measured Physical Activity Is Associated with Static Balance in Young Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Research in Indonesian Youth: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Physical Activity in 15-17-Year-Old Adolescents as Compensation for Sedentary Behavior in School.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Effectiveness of a Water Intake Program at the Workplace in Physical and Mental Health Outcomes.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Stuart J H BiddleInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia.
Jason A BennieInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia.
Katrien De CockerInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia.
David DunstanBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Paul A GardinerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Genevieve N HealySchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Brigid LynchCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia.
Neville OwenBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Charlotte BrakenridgeThe University of Queensland, RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Wendy BrownSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Matthew BumanCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Bronwyn ClarkSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Ing-Mari DohrnDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, 11330 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mitch DuncanFaculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia.
Nicholas GilsonSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Tracy Kolbe-AlexanderInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia.
Toby PaveyFaculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Natasha ReidSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Corneel VandelanotteSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia.
Ineke VergeerInstitute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, QLD 4300, Australia.
Grace E VincentSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development in research concerning sedentary behaviour has been rapid over the past two decades. This has led to the development of evidence and views that have become more advanced, diverse and, possibly, contentious. These include the effects of standing, the breaking up of prolonged sitting and the role of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in the association between sedentary behaviour and health outcomes. The present aim is to report the views of experts (n = 21) brought together (one-day face-to-face meeting in 2018) to consider these issues and provide conclusions and recommendations for future work. Each topic was reviewed and presented by one expert followed by full group discussion, which was recorded, transcribed and analysed. The experts concluded that (a). standing may bring benefits that accrue from postural shifts. Prolonged (mainly static) standing and prolonged sitting are both bad for health; (b). 'the best posture is the next posture'. Regularly breaking up of sitting with postural shifts and movement is vital; (c). health effects of prolonged sitting are evident even after controlling for MVPA, but high levels of MVPA can attenuate the deleterious effects of prolonged sitting depending on the health outcome of interest. Expert discussion addressed measurement, messaging and future directions.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorSedentary BehaviorExerciseFemaleHumansMalePostureQueenslandbreaksdebatehealthmediationmoderationphysical activityposturesedentarystanding

Identifiers

PMID31783708
PMCPMC6926563

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.