Evidence mapPaperPMID 31801623Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2019

Development of the Health Awareness and Behaviour Tool (HABiT): reliability and suitability for a Canadian older adult population.

Gina Agarwal, Melissa Pirrie, Ricardo Angeles, Francine Marzanek, Jenna Parascandalo

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Associations of Dietary Inflammatory Potential With Musculoskeletal Health in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older People: The Mr. OS and Ms. OS (Hong Kong) Cohort Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gina AgarwalDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, DBHSC, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. gina.agarwal@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5691-4675
Melissa PirrieDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, DBHSC, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ricardo AngelesDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, DBHSC, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Francine MarzanekDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, DBHSC, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jenna ParascandaloDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, 100 Main St. W, DBHSC, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 133563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining the effectiveness of community-based health promotion and disease prevention programs requires an appropriate data collection tool. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive health questionnaire for older adults, called the HABiT, and evaluate its reliability, content validity, and face validity in assessing individual health-related items (e.g., health status, healthcare utilization) and five specific scales: knowledge, current health behaviors (risk factors), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), perceived risk and understanding, and self-efficacy.

methodsIterative survey development and evaluation of its psychometric properties in a convenience sample of 28 older adults (≥ 55 years old), half from a low-income population. Following item generation, the questionnaire was assessed for content validity (expert panel), face validity (participant feedback), internal consistency of each scale (Cronbach's alpha), and test-retest reliability for each item and scale (Pearson's r and phi correlations, as appropriate).

resultsQuestions were drawn from 15 sources, but primarily three surveys: Canadian Community Health Survey, Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire (CANRISK), and a survey by the Canadian Hypertension Education Program. Expert consensus was attained for item inclusion and representation of the desired constructs. Participants completing the questionnaire deemed the questions to be clear and appropriate. Test-retest reliability for many individual items was moderate-to-high, with some exceptions for items that can reasonably change in a short period (e.g., perceived day-to-day stress). Of the five potential scales evaluated, two had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.60) and a subset of one scale also had acceptable internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was high (correlation ≥ 0.80) for all scales and sub-scales.

conclusionsThe HABiT is a reliable and suitable comprehensive tool with content and face validity that can be used to evaluate health promotion and chronic disease prevention programs in older adults, including low-income older adults. Some noted limitations are discussed. Data collected using this tool also provides a diabetes risk score, health literacy score, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for economic analysis.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthAgedAwarenessCanadaFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationPsychometricsQualitative ResearchQuality-Adjusted Life YearsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentHealth behaviorHealthcare utilizationHealth knowledgeHealth literacyLow incomeOlder adultsQuality of lifeQuestionnaire development

Identifiers

PMID31801623
PMCPMC6892189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.