Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31808273›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2020

Nested-association mapping (NAM)-based genetic dissection uncovers candidate genes for seed and pod weights in peanut (Arachis hypogaea).

Sunil S Gangurde, Hui Wang, Shasidhar Yaduru, Manish K Pandey, Jake C Fountain, Ye Chu, Thomas Isleib, C Corley Holbrook, Alencar Xavier, Albert K Culbreath and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sunil S GangurdeInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7119-8649
Hui WangCrop Protection and Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA, USA.
Shasidhar YaduruInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Manish K PandeyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4101-6530
Jake C FountainCrop Protection and Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA, USA.
Ye ChuHorticulture Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA.
Thomas IsleibDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
C Corley HolbrookCrop Genetics and Breeding Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Tifton, GA, USA.
Alencar XavierBiostatistics, Corteva Agrisciences, Johnston, IA, USA.
Albert K CulbreathDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA.
Peggy Ozias-AkinsHorticulture Department, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Baozhu GuoDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9079-7126
Agricultural Research Service · USUniversity of Georgia · USInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INCorteva (United States) · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiparental genetic mapping populations such as nested-association mapping (NAM) have great potential for investigating quantitative traits and associated genomic regions leading to rapid discovery of candidate genes and markers. To demonstrate the utility and power of this approach, two NAM populations, NAM_Tifrunner and NAM_Florida-07, were used for dissecting genetic control of 100-pod weight (PW) and 100-seed weight (SW) in peanut. Two high-density SNP-based genetic maps were constructed with 3341 loci and 2668 loci for NAM_Tifrunner and NAM_Florida-07, respectively. The quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis identified 12 and 8 major effect QTLs for PW and SW, respectively, in NAM_Tifrunner, and 13 and 11 major effect QTLs for PW and SW, respectively, in NAM_Florida-07. Most of the QTLs associated with PW and SW were mapped on the chromosomes A05, A06, B05 and B06. A genomewide association study (GWAS) analysis identified 19 and 28 highly significant SNP-trait associations (STAs) in NAM_Tifrunner and 11 and 17 STAs in NAM_Florida-07 for PW and SW, respectively. These significant STAs were co-localized, suggesting that PW and SW are co-regulated by several candidate genes identified on chromosomes A05, A06, B05, and B06. This study demonstrates the utility of NAM population for genetic dissection of complex traits and performing high-resolution trait mapping in peanut.

Indexed as

ArachisQuantitative Trait LociChromosome MappingGenetic LinkageGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypeSeedsassociation mappingcandidate geneslinkage mappingnested-association mappingpeanutpod weightseed weight

Identifiers

PMID31808273
PMCPMC7206994
OpenAlexW2992255453

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.