Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31815092›Full record

ArticleCurrent geriatrics reports2019

Integrating Frailty and Cognitive Phenotypes: Why, How, Now What?

Qian-Li Xue, Brian Buta, Lina Ma, Meiling Ge, Michelle Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current geriatrics reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Body Mass Index and Cognition: Associations Across 
Mid- to Late Life and Gender Differences.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Principles and Issues for Physical Frailty Measurement and Its Clinical Application.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian-Li XueDepartment of Medicine Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Brian ButaDepartment of Medicine Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lina MaDepartment of Geriatrics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meiling GeThe Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics (National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Michelle CarlsonDepartment of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Technological Assessment and Solutions Core - RC4P30AG021334 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy D Walston · 2003 to 2026
$33.2M
Physical Frailty and Cognitive Impairment: Intersection, Measurement & EtiologiesR03AG053743 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI XUE, QIAN-LI · 2016 to 2017
$163k
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021334NIA NIH HHS R03 AG053743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review elucidates the concept of frailty in relationship to reserve and resilience, the relationships and shared pathophysiology between physical frailty and cognitive impairment, the theoretical underpinnings of three integrated phenotypes of physical and cognitive impairments, and the potential of incorporating biomarkers into phenotype refinement and validation. RECENT

findingsThe fact that frailty and cognitive impairment are associated and often coexist in older adults has led to the popular view of expanding the definition of frailty to include cognitive impairment. However, there is great variability in approaches to and assumptions regarding the integrated phenotypes of physical frailty and cognitive impairment. SUMMARY: The development of integrated frailty and cognitive phenotypes should explicate the types of frailty and cognitive impairment they intend to capture and prioritize the incorporation of biological theories that help determine shared and distinct pathways in the progression to physical and cognitive impairments.

Indexed as

Aging PhenotypesCognitive FrailtyGeriatric SyndromeReserveResilienceStressors

Identifiers

PMID31815092
PMCPMC6897328

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.