Evidence mapPaperPMID 31822926Full record

ArticleHerz2020

[Primary prevention of coronary heart disease : Evidence-based drug treatment].

Franziska Mühleck, Ulrich Laufs

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2020
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Franziska MühleckKlinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. Franziska.muehleck@uniklinik-leipzig.de.
Ulrich LaufsKlinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Lifestyle modifications and drug treatment of cardiovascular risk factors are able to effectively prevent CAD. The basis of prevention is the assessment of the individual cardiovascular risk, e.g. by using a validated risk score. Documented evidence for prevention of CAD is available for the control of hypertension using angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and calcium antagonists, for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia using statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK-9) inhibitors and for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with metformin, sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists. There is no positive benefit-risk ratio for people with a low risk in the use of acetylsalicylic acid in primary prevention, in contrast to the positive recommendations for secondary prevention. There is no evidence for the efficacy of primary prevention with beta blockers, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glitazones, sulfonylureas or insulin. Similarly, there is no evidence for drug treatment of obesity, any supplementation with vitamins or hormone preparations or omega‑3 fatty acids.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Primary PreventionGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansHypoglycemic AgentsGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Hypoglycemic AgentsAspirinFish oilsHormonesMetabolic syndromeVitamins

Identifiers

PMID31822926
OpenAlexW2995199183

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.