Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31826883›Full record

SynthesisBMJ sexual & reproductive health2020

A systematic review of the effectiveness of counselling strategies for modern contraceptive methods: what works and what doesn't?

Francesca L Cavallaro, Lenka Benova, Onikepe O Owolabi, Moazzam Ali

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ sexual & reproductive health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06521138 (The Effect of Transtheoretical Model-Based Antenatal and Postnatal Motivational Interviewing on Contraceptive Self-Efficacy, Contraceptive Attitude and Contraceptive Use), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06521138 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Transtheoretical Model-Based Antenatal and Postnatal Motivational Interviewing on Contraceptive Self-Efficacy, Contraceptive Attitude and Contraceptive Use: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGazi UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled72ConditionsSupportive CareArmsMotivational interviewing group, Control group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesca L CavallaroUniversity College London, London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9641-8780
Lenka BenovaInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Onikepe O OwolabiGuttmacher Institute, New York, New York, USA.
Moazzam AliWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland alimoa@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-6949-8976

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on the comparative effectiveness of different counselling strategies for modern contraception on contraceptive behaviour and satisfaction, and to examine their advantages and disadvantages.

methodsSix electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Global Health, Popline, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Library) were searched to identify publications comparing two or more contraceptive counselling strategies and reporting quantitative results on contraceptive use, uptake, continuation or switching, or client satisfaction. Studies of women or couples from any country, published in English since 1990 were considered.

resultsA total of 63 publications corresponding to 61 studies met the inclusion criteria. There was substantial heterogeneity in study settings, interventions and outcome measures. Interventions targeting women initiating a method (including structured counselling on side effects) tended to show positive effects on contraceptive continuation. In contrast, the majority of studies of provider training and decision-making tools for method choice did not find evidence of an effect. Additional antenatal or postpartum counselling sessions were associated with increased postpartum contraceptive use, regardless of their timing in pregnancy or postpartum. Dedicated pre-abortion contraceptive counselling was associated with increased use only when accompanied by broader contraceptive method provision. Male partner or couples counselling was effective at increasing contraceptive use in two of five studies targeting non-users, women initiating implants or seeking abortion. High-quality evidence is lacking for the majority of intervention types.

conclusionsThe evidence base and quality of studies are limited, and further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of many counselling interventions in different settings.

Indexed as

Contraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsCounselingData ManagementFemaleHumansPatient SatisfactionPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedContraceptive Agentsclient satisfactioncontraceptive behaviourcounsellingfamily planning service provisionmethod continuationmodern contraceptives

Identifiers

PMID31826883
PMCPMC7569400

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.